ϳԹ

Arc’Teryx M20 ski pack
M20 ski pack

Which backpack can transition from resort to backcountry skiing?

I’m an experienced front-country (resort) skier and would like to expand into the backcountry. Can you recommend a good ski pack that works well in both conditions? Walker Boston, Massachusetts

Published:  Updated: 
Arc’Teryx M20 ski pack

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

You have several good choices here, Walker. The key requirements are as follows: Somewhere around 1,500 to 2,000 cubic inches of capacity (enough for extra clothing, lunch, and self-rescue gear but not so much that you’re carrying a big, flapping pack); good lash-on points for skis, avalanche shovels, and other gear; and a fit that hugs like Carmen Electra, so the pack doesn’t mess with your schussing.

Arc’Teryx M20 ski pack

Arc’Teryx M20 ski pack M20 ski pack

For years the gold standard was Dana Design’s Bomb Pack, so named because of its popularity with ski patrollers who used it to lug their avalanche-control grenades. And even though Marmot purchased what was left of the fading Dana marquee a few years back, the Bomb lives on. Now tricked out in Marmot labeling (www.marmot.com), it’s much like the well-used Bomb Pack currently in my gear loft: More capacity than most people need (3,100 cubic inches), but with ski holsters, a shovel pocket, and a suspension that can handle the weight if you decide to lug a bag of cement. At $229, the price is a bit steep, but the Bomb remains an excellent pack.

That said, perhaps a more reasonably sized pack is Arc’Teryx’s ski-specific M20 ($150; www.arcteryx.com). It has almost 1,350 cubic inches of capicity in the tall size, plus the ability to carry skis or snowboards and other backcountry ski gear. Waterproof zippers and a highly water-resistant bag material, plus a roll-top design, ensure that your gear stays dry but is readily accessible. Arc’Teryx had the skier in mind and fitted the pack so it stays close to your back.

Or, take a look at Osprey’s excellent, ski-specific Switch 36 ($150; www.ospreypacks.com). It’s a bit bigger than the M20 but not as big as the Bomb, with about 2,200 cubic inches of capacity. And it has lots of thoughtful snow-specific features, such as a special goggle pocket, a separate compartment for wet gear, easy side access, and the ability to carry skis vertically or diagonally. Osprey is really on top of its game these days, and the Switch 36 shows some solid pack design.

Get more advice from the Gear Guy as he picks this season’s top gifts in You’ll probably find a few things to put on your own wish list, too.

Popular on ϳԹ Online