ϳԹ

Osprey Variant 52 Backpack
Variant 52 Backpack

Are old-school backpacks worth buying, or has technology advanced too much?

I have the chance to purchase an old, never-used Dana Design Bomb pack to replace my Dana Sluiskin 30, which has proven to be a bit small. I do a lot of peak bagging and some light overnights in Colorado and occasionally take friends who don't have packs. What do you think? Mark Topeka, Kansas

Published:  Updated: 
Osprey Variant 52 Backpack

New perk: Easily find new routes and hidden gems, upcoming running events, and more near you. Your weekly Local Running Newsletter has everything you need to lace up! .

Ah, the Dana Design Bomb. Possibly the most classic daypack of all time. I still have one somewhere. Purple and red. Very 80s.

Osprey Variant 52 Backpack

Osprey Variant 52 Backpack Variant 52 Backpack

If you can, but it just to have it. What a cool thing to have in 20 years! Otherwise, much as I love the Bomb, pack technology has progressed. Take ’s Variant 52 ($199). It’s lighter than the Bomb, for starters. And it has a feature that is heir to the Shovit pocket—a handy place to stuff jackets and ropes that’s expandable and outside of the main pocket. It also has a much trimmer suspension than da Bomb that still makes 30-pound loads easily manageable. Or more in a pinch. So the Variant would a great choice.

For more of a daypack-size pack (the Variant holds 3,200 cubic inches and is a small overnight pack for today’s gear), try the Z35-R ($159), It’s a 2,100 cubic inch pack that does very nicely carrying big day loads. And it has a front “bucket” pocket that is the same thing as a Shovit. I have the version that doesn’t have the bucket pocket (the Z35) and like it a lot. Very light, good suspension, and good load-carrying ability.

I have more advice: Get your friends to buy their own damn packs!

The 2008 Summer ϳԹ Buyer’s Guide is now online. From riding to trail-running to camping, get reviews of nearly 400 gear must-haves.

Filed to:

Popular on ϳԹ Online