Hipster-favoritegear brand Poleris no more. The maker of camping equipment and apparel for Chapter 7 bankruptcy.
Founded in 2011, the Portland, Oregon, company built its brand on a laid-back approach tocamping. Promoting what it calledcamp vibes,the company preached a fun, fashion-focused, highly Instagrammable version of the outdoorslifestyle, where hanging out—not summiting a peak or rafting Class IV rapids—was the main goal.
Its line of “stuff”—as Poler informally referred to its gear—reflected this mantra: roomymesh-walled tents, utilitarian puffy coats, and the Napsack, a wearable sleeping bag with arm holes and a hood. All of it came in vibrant prints and with affordable price tags, and it grew popularamong young, less hardcore outdoorspeople.
Benji Wagner, cofounder and creative director, would not comment on the details of what led to the bankruptcy filing. But, ,the docket shows that revenue fell from $7.2 million in 2017 to $3.4 million for January through November 2018, and that owners attempted to sell the company at some point in 2018.
The bankruptcy paperwork was filed on November 30, but, Poler’s Portland headquarters shuttered earlier, on September 30.
According to Brian Audette, a bankruptcy lawyer at the firm Perkins Coie, Poler’s downfall is part of a negativetrend in retail over the past year—one he thinks will extend into 2019. “I suspect that the outdoor retail industry is suffering the same fate as many other industries that are brick-and-mortar based,” he says. The Chapter 7 filing means all of the company’s assets—patents, trademarks, and remaining inventory—will be liquidated to pay off its $2.3 million in liabilities(as opposed to Chapter 11 filing, which allows companies to restructure, pay off debts, and then return to business as usual).
The is now a plain page with a logo and brief message: “We’ve sold out of Poler stuff for 2018. See you down the road for more camp vibes and high fives in 2019.”
Audette says we probablywon’t be seeing Poler gear reemerge any time soon. “Somebody could buy the trademark and name,” he says. “It’s possible, but unlikely.”