Bill McKibben Archives - ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online /byline/bill-mckibben/ Live Bravely Thu, 12 May 2022 17:08:37 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.1 https://cdn.outsideonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/07/favicon-194x194-1.png Bill McKibben Archives - ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online /byline/bill-mckibben/ 32 32 This Decision Will Unlock Emissions Endgame /outdoor-adventure/environment/decision-will-unlock-emissions-endgame/ Thu, 29 Jan 2015 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/decision-will-unlock-emissions-endgame/ This Decision Will Unlock Emissions Endgame

Keystone has drawn more Americans into the streets than any environmental issue in a generation, produced more comments to the government than any infrastructure project in history, and spawned more arrests than just about any cause for many years.

The post This Decision Will Unlock Emissions Endgame appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
This Decision Will Unlock Emissions Endgame

Early in January, a team of researchers from University College London . It took the most important fact about global warming—that the world’s fossil fuel companies have already located five times more carbon than scientists say we can burn without overheating the planet—and added a new layer of detail, exploring precisely which deposits should be left untouched. High on the list is Canada’s vast tar sands, which the authors said should be tapped for only a “negligible†amount of oil going forward if we are serious about dealing with climate change.

The paper came as vindication, as the long fight over the Keystone pipeline finally seems to be drawing to a close. The fight started with brave resistance from First Nations people in Alberta and ranchers in Nebraska, but it went global in 2011 when former NOAA climatologist James Hansen, the planet’s premier climate scientist, published a paper showing for the first time that a vast pool of carbon lay beneath the tar sands. Pump it all, he said, and it would be . Despite that warning, everyone thought Keystone was a done deal. In fact, a poll of “energy and environment insidersâ€Â in October 2011 found that 91 percent expected that TransCanada would receive its presidential permit in short order.

Keystone has drawn more Americans into the streets than any environmental issue in a generation, produced more comments to the government than any infrastructure project in history, and spawned more arrests than just about any cause for many years.

That the company hasn’t been awarded a permit is a triumph of organizing: Keystone has drawn more Americans into the streets than any environmental issue in a generation, produced more comments to the government than any infrastructure project in history, and spawned more arrests than just about any cause for many years.

If President Obama does the right thing, it will be the first time in history that a world leader has said, “Here's a big project I'm not going to approve because of the climate.†As the Nature article makes clear, this carbon deposit must remain substantially untapped if we’re to have a prayer of holding temperature increases to two degrees Celsius—the internationally recognized red line for climate. It’s not the only carbon pool we must leave alone. There are also the coalfields of Wyoming and Australia, the fracking zones of California and Poland, and the deep-sea deposits off Brazil and the Arctic. But Canada’s tar sands are a good place to start.

Author Bill McKibben () teaches at Middlebury College in Vermont and founded . In 2014 he was awarded the , sometimes called the “alternative Nobel,” in the Swedish Parliament.

The post This Decision Will Unlock Emissions Endgame appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
The Economic Case Against Keystone XL /outdoor-adventure/environment/economic-case-against-keystone-xl/ Sun, 09 Oct 2011 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/economic-case-against-keystone-xl/ The Economic Case Against Keystone XL

Recently, the argument for the Keystone XL pipeline has been framed as the economy versus the environment. BILL McKIBBEN takes a hard look at the job creation numbers and calculates a different reality—stopping the pipeline could lead to a brighter economic future.

The post The Economic Case Against Keystone XL appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
The Economic Case Against Keystone XL

By this point, everyone knows that the Keystone XL Pipeline is an environmental disaster in the making—that’s what happens when twenty of the nation’s top scientists sign a to the president stating “categorically that it’s not only not in the national interest, it’s also not in the planet’s best interest.â€

And by this point, everyone knows it’s an ethical disaster—that’s what happens when ten Nobel Peace Prize laureates (right up to the Dalai Lama!) issue a explaining that Your rejection of the pipeline provides a tremendous opportunity to begin transition away from our dependence on oil, coal and gas and instead increase investments in renewable energies and energy efficiency.

By now, there’s only one argument left standing for proponents of the planned 1700-mile pipeline from the tar sands of northern Alberta to the Gulf of Mexico. That argument is jobs, jobs, jobs—and they’ve been making it with gusto. At first they were relatively circumspect—the head of Transcanada Pipeline talked about the pipeline creating 20,000 temporary jobs. But soon rightwing politicians upped the figure . The U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which spends much of its time figuring out how to make it easier for U.S. corporations to outsource their workforces overseas, has been the highest bidder: it’s director, Thomas Donohue, has thundered from a dozen podiums the promise that the pipeline would .Ìý

Which is a lot. It’s as many jobs as the whole American economy creates in the course of a normal month these days. Were it true—well, it probably still wouldn’t outweigh the destruction of the planet, but it would make for an interesting ethical balancing act.

Unfortunately, it isn’t true. In fact, it’s the purest kind of nonsense, apparently based on some extrapolation of the total economic activity such a pipeline would generate over the next century, an extrapolation performed by some consultant hired by pipeline proponents. These proponents—people like the Koch Brothers, who run a big tar sands operation—are people who don’t trust climate models built by the smartest physicists and chemists, yet they’re willing to tout some jobs estimate they got from a consultant who . (And who somehow missed the fact that the whole pipeline is only designed to last fifty years).Ìý

In fact, there’s now been a rigorous study of the pipeline, performed by a group with roots not in industry but in the labor movement. The Cornell Global Labor Institute looked carefully at all the project specifications and : yes, it will create jobs. Somewhere between 2500 and 4650 people will be needed to build the pipeline. Those jobs will be temporary (once a pipeline is built it doesn’t take many people to run) but then construction jobs are by definition temporary. In our economy, even 2500 jobs are nothing to sneeze at.

But Cornell looked, too, at the jobs the new pipeline would kill. At the moment, the fairly small amount of oil from tar sands that makes it into this country has to head for a few refineries in the Midwest, and that’s helped lower the cost of gasoline in the region. With new markets for the crude overseas (most of Keystone XL’s oil will be exported), the Gulf of Mexico extension will raise the price of Chicago gas—and that will be enough to wreck as many jobs as it creates.  

So—a wash. Except, not really. Because the pipeline will have another effect. It will tie us for another generation to fossil fuel, helping slow the switch to wind and solar. That switch is just beginning—but already there are more Americans employed in the solar industry than in, say, coal-mining. If we could ever decide to decisively break our addiction to fossil fuel, that jobs wave could become a tsunami—it takes a lot more people to put solar panels on America’s roofs than to build a single pipe.

Which is why America’s unions have split on the Keystone XL project. The Laborers, understandably, see pipeline construction as right up their alley and so have fought hard in support of the project. But the Transport Workers Union and the Amalgamated Transit Union, which have huge numbers of people who do green things like drive buses, have been outspoken in their opposition. Here’s how they put it in a joint last summer: “We need jobs, but not ones based on increasing our reliance on Tar Sands oil. There is no shortage of water and sewage pipelines that need to be fixed or replaced, bridges and tunnels that are in need of emergency repair, transportation infrastructure that needs to be renewed and developed. Many jobs could also be created in energy conservation, upgrading the grid, maintaining and expanding public transportation—jobs that can help us reduce air pollution, greenhouse gas emissions, and improve energy efficiency.â€

In other words, they thought with care and complexity about an emotionally charged issue, instead of just framing it as jobs versus the environment. Would that our political class labor as hard.

The post The Economic Case Against Keystone XL appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
It’s Not Getting Any Colder /outdoor-adventure/environment/its-not-getting-any-colder/ Wed, 27 Feb 2008 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/its-not-getting-any-colder/ IS IT OK, JUST FOR A MOMENT, not to be all jolly about the environmental crisis we now face? I am entirely in favor of green building, smart metering, carbon-neutral reggaeton festivals, presidential solar panels, eco-christenings, eco-weddings, eco-funerals. We’ve made more political progress on environmental issues this year than in the previous 20. Al Gore … Continued

The post It’s Not Getting Any Colder appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
IS IT OK, JUST FOR A MOMENT, not to be all jolly about the environmental crisis we now face?

I am entirely in favor of green building, smart metering, carbon-neutral reggaeton festivals, presidential solar panels, eco-christenings, eco-weddings, eco-funerals. We’ve made more political progress on environmental issues this year than in the previous 20. Al Gore won the Nobel. The hipster band Guster is on board.

But it’s still a crisis. Global warming is the biggest thing we’ve ever done to the earth, and the news from science is getting worse at least as fast as the news from politics is improving. Dealing with it is going to take more than getting your tail in a Prius—it will even take more than getting the respective tails of Alicia Silverstone, Dr. Andrew Weil, Billy Crystal, Brad Pitt, Cameron Diaz, Donny Osmond, Ed Begley, Harrison Ford, Kevin Bacon, Kirk Douglas, Dr. Oliver Sacks, and Robin Williams into Priuses.

In fact, if you want to be realistic—which in my experience increases your chances of being right—the only question is what kind of a crisis we’re talking about: the nasty kind you get through or the nasty kind you don’t get through.

The first kind—bad but bearable—can seem impossible when contemplated from a distance. Like divorce: impossible enough that people do all they can to avoid it. But then you’re sucked out of the smooth water and into the rapids and you’re no longer contemplating something dauntingly large; you’re just handling the details as they come roaring at you: court dates, separate apartments, garnishments, weekend-visitation rights. It’s not fun, but half the country has been through a divorce. You deal, and eventually you’re out the other side, maybe chastened, maybe poorer, definitely different, but still intact.

Global warming might work out like that. We’ve spent two decades hoping it would get better on its own, but now, pretty clearly, we’re going to start doing something. New technologies are coming online faster than we could have hoped, and political attitudes are starting to change, too. Lightbulbs, carbon taxes,
international treaties: We’re in the process of rolling up our sleeves, and any minute now we’re actually going to get at it—and then it’s going to be OK, yes? Things will be different, but different is good, right?

HERE’S THE BEST CASE: The U.S. breaks its political logjam and passes ambitious caps on carbon, pledging to reduce emissions quickly and dramatically. This reconfigures economic gravity, so that money now flows toward the sun and wind and insulation, not coal. That money starts producing engineering breakthroughs, lowering the price of everything from solar panels to plug-in hybrids so rapidly that the technologies spread as quickly as, say, the Wii Remote.

Meanwhile, seeing that rapid change is possible, we in the rich world rise to our obligations and embark on a kind of global Marshall Plan to deploy the same new gear all over the world, allowing China and India and everyone else to develop without burning their coal. Meanwhile, we make noble changes in our habits—the rising price of gas leads to the demand for decent mass transit, and once the bus is there we actually decide to, you know, take it. We become less American, more European, and we encourage the developing world to aspire to Oslo and not Orange County.

Oh, and the earth responds. Seeing our good intentions and rapid progress, nature backs off a little. Sea levels rise in inches, not feet. We build some levees and we evacuate some low-lying Pacific atolls. It could happen. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, that noble band of climate experts, calculated last spring that we could build all the technology we needed to hold carbon emissions down at an eminently reasonable cost; in the next 20 years it would knock about one 12th of 1 percent off gross world product annually. As The Economist, that Trotskyite rag, put it, “The world would hardly notice.”

But then there’s the other kind of crisis, the one that begins with the Very Concerned Doctor sitting down across from you. And now we’re talking about a different kind of regimen. The changes aren’t just daunting; they’re damaging—technicians are X-ing target=s on your body with grease pencil and your hair is falling out. A lump in one place turns into a shadow in a dozen others, and the “treatments” start seeming very nearly as bad as the problem, and your friends are scanning the Internet for news of new, novel cures.

If you were laying down odds right about now, you’d be hard-pressed not to lean toward this scenario. Late last summer, the sheets of Arctic sea ice began to thin at a markedly faster rate: There was a week when an area the size of Florida melted every single day. And the same kind of bad lab results were coming back from many different systems: tundra permafrost, temperate-forest soils, Amazon aridity. Small flare-ups caught everyone’s attention: Wildfire blazed across a parched Southern California, drought dropped Lake Lanier so low that Atlanta started measuring its water supply in weeks. Worse than we’d feared, and spreading faster. There seems little doubt now that this century will be at least as tough as the scientific consensus has been warning: crop-threatening heat waves, rapid spread of mosquito-borne disease, the whole litany.

But now we’ve begun to fear that it may be very much worse even than we had feared. New data from Greenland and the west Antarctic suggests that those great ice sheets are becoming dangerously unstable—and with that comes the possibility of sea level rising not merely a few feet this century, but a few meters. Which takes us from civilization-challenging to civilization-threatening. Greenland alone has about 25 feet of sea-level rise locked in its mile-thick glaciers. Boot up Google Earth if you want to see what this would mean for your local coastline. No wonder serious scientists are starting to talk about, say, orbiting giant shades to cast cooling geometric shadows, or flooding the upper atmosphere with sulfur dioxide. Desperate measures

WE DON’T KNOW YET if we’re facing type one or type two. But in both cases the actions are pretty much the same: We need to change, quickly and comprehensively. This means go ahead and screw in the lightbulb, but then screw in the new senator immediately thereafter. Big political action—in Washington, and then internationally—is the only way we can start snuffing carbon fast enough.

The difference comes in attitude. If you’re dealing with a bad-but-bearable problem, it’s best to be flexible, to compromise, to negotiate and arbitrate and mediate. This is what we’re starting to do, finally. Congress is grudgingly raising mileage standards, and the international community at least met in Bali to talk about talking. Nothing to sneeze at. But if your back is against the wall, then it’s time to fight. And by fight I mean out in the streets, as if your life depended on it. This is starting to happen—in the past year a few of us have organized almost 2,000 rallies in all 50 states. This doesn’t take much in the way of money or a big organization. Just start e-mailing everyone you know and saying, “If you’re worried, if you’re mad, if you want to feel hopeful: Hold a demonstration.” They’ve mostly been polite, even good-humored: scuba divers underwater in the Florida Keys, skiers descending en masse down the melting glaciers of the Rockies and Cascades. But they came with an edge, too—the demand, not the request, for meaningful action now. A demand that has begun to make some headway.

But not enough. We have a few years, no more, to make the kind of deep switch the science requires; if the next president doesn’t take it on as job one, then the presidents who follow won’t be able to make much difference. Which means we need a stronger movement, one that’s willing to take real chances. Six or seven years ago, I met the nonagenarian extreme activist Granny D, fresh off her cross-country walk to demand reform. We were both participating in one of the first protests against global warming on Capitol Hill. As we were being arrested and led away, she looked up at me and said, “I’m 91, and I’ve never been arrested before. I should have started long ago.” That’s known, I think, as calling you out.

Maybe Greenland won’t melt; maybe it will just be the mosquitoes and the drought. The choice is not the lady or the tiger—we’re going to get a tiger. The question is how hungry the tiger’s going to be. And how tough we are.

The post It’s Not Getting Any Colder appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Sugar Daddy /outdoor-adventure/snow-sports/sugar-daddy/ Wed, 01 Feb 2006 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/sugar-daddy/ Sugar Daddy

IS THERE A DOWNSIDE TO HAVING 4 percent body fat spread across a frame of rippling muscle? Only if you’re looking for injection sites. “I’ve about used up the bottom two cans of my six-pack,” says Kris Freeman, a 25-year-old Olympic hopeful who makes your average Greek sculpture look like some schlub feeding off the … Continued

The post Sugar Daddy appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Sugar Daddy

IS THERE A DOWNSIDE TO HAVING 4 percent body fat spread across a frame of rippling muscle? Only if you’re looking for injection sites. “I’ve about used up the bottom two cans of my six-pack,” says Kris Freeman, a 25-year-old Olympic hopeful who makes your average Greek sculpture look like some schlub feeding off the Little Debbie rack at the Gas-N-Go. “I massage them, but the scar tissue is getting a little crunchy,” he notes. “Eventually I may have to go to my ass.”

The 2006 Winter Olympics

for ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online’s complete coverage of the 2006 Winter Olympics, including behind-the-scene dispatches from Torino.
Fast track: Freeman during training in Fairbanks. Fast track: Freeman during training in Fairbanks.

For Park City, Utah–based Freeman, the best nordic skier this country has produced in a generation, there’s no getting around the needles. The 2003 under-23 world champion now has a shot—albeit a long shot—at walking away with America’s first Olympic hardware in cross-country since Bill Koch took silver in the 30K at Innsbruck in 1976. But unless and until he does, Freeman is fated to be known as the only guy in Turin sponsored by both a ski company (Fischer) and an insulin supplier (Eli Lilly). That’s because Kris Freeman is the world’s best endurance athlete with diabetes.

Freeman grew up skiing on old boards in backwoods Andover, New Hampshire, kind of like alpine star Bode Miller. But unlike Bode, he has a talent for obscurity. In high school, Freeman excelled in the most arcane of all winter disciplines, the nordic combined—you go off the ski jump, and the guy who soars the farthest gets a lead in the cross-country race that follows. At 15, he won the 1996 junior nationals, despite starting the cross-country portion of the race four minutes behind the jumping leader. His decision, the next year, to concentrate solely on nordic skiing explains a good deal about his psyche. “One of the jumping guys tried to persuade me to stay with the program, and he’d say, ‘Those nordic guys—they never party, all they think about is training.’ And I thought, Dang, he’s talking about me.”

In 2000, with more than a dozen national titles to his name, Freeman was feeling a little logy. Blood tests revealed diabetes. To continue competing, he’d have to keep his blood sugar absolutely level. If not, well, insulin shock is a little like bonking, in the same way that flying is a little like flapping your arms. U.S. Nordic Ski Team doctor Larry Gaul recalls one 20K race last season in Sweden, when he missed handing Freeman a ten-ounce sports drink as he crested a hill halfway through the course. Freeman became “delirious,” says Gaul. “He was disoriented. He had no idea where he was.” Gaul and the other coaches now carry emergency syringes “in case we find him passed out in the snow.”

Chances are they won’t. Freeman is—in the best sense of the word—a control freak. Before a World Cup race, he likes to arrive at the course with four days to spare. “Each environment is a different stress—the altitude, the food. If I eat the exact same breakfast four days in a row, I can get the insulin dialed in.” Which is good, because on race morning, Freeman, like the rest of the field, is out testing wax, looking for an extra inch or two of glide. There’s barely time for seven or eight finger jabs to calibrate his sugar, and three or four injections to top off his insulin. All the while trying to remain calm. “Some people think being on edge helps you out, and I used to like that feeling,” says Freeman, “but adrenaline raises blood sugar, so I force myself to relax. Maybe I’ll listen to heavy metal before a race—but only a ballad.”

Unlike downhill skiing, which demands a few minutes of no-holds-barred effort, tops, a cross-country race is all about containing emotions. “It’s going as fast as you can without crossing the barrier where you put lactate in your muscles,” explains Freeman. A runner on flat ground can calculate the magic point by pace—one 5:20 mile after another and you’ve got yourself a nifty marathon. But a skier traveling up and down steep hills, and racing on ice one day and mush the next, has to be listening far more carefully to his body—especially when that skier is at risk for diabetic shock.

Eating lunch with Freeman in the cafeteria at the Olympic Training Center in Lake Placid is a lesson in spartan living: “I don’t view food as something to enjoy,” he says, spooning down some cottage cheese. “It’s just fuel. If I don’t need it, I don’t eat it.” But if you believe, as many physiologists do, that only rowers rival nordic skiers for total-body fitness, that strategy has made him one of the world’s premier athletes—and America’s biggest threat in the 15K classic in Turin.

At 25, Freeman is younger than his European rivals, including Estonia’s Andrus Veerpalu, 35, who won gold in the 15K at Salt Lake in 2002. Freeman’s only now entering the prime for endurance skiers; he should hit his peak in Vancouver four years from now. But the American insists that this year’s Games could be the moment he helps persuade his countrymen to pull those skinny skis off the garage wall and head into the woods. “I need to take a medal, because then there will be some money and some attention for the sport,” he says. “They’ve put a lot of time into us, and now it’s time for a payoff.”

Sound a little calculating? Calculating is what’s gotten him this far.

The post Sugar Daddy appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Mr. Natural /health/mr-natural/ Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/mr-natural/ Mr. Natural

IT WAS 7:15 ON A GRAY WINTER MORNING, and I was walking across an icy parking lot at the Lahey Clinic, outside Boston, when I slipped and went down hard. Banged but not broken, I jumped up in the cartoon-quick way that guys do, as if to imply that I hadn’t actually fallen but was … Continued

The post Mr. Natural appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Mr. Natural

IT WAS 7:15 ON A GRAY WINTER MORNING, and I was walking across an icy parking lot at the Lahey Clinic, outside Boston, when I slipped and went down hard. Banged but not broken, I jumped up in the cartoon-quick way that guys do, as if to imply that I hadn’t actually fallen but was just making a planned reconnaissance of the pavement. It was precisely the kind of accident that I’d had my share of in my first 40 years. A fluke, an outlier, unpredictable.


I was headed in for a full-day battery of tests. Lahey is a vast medical city, its walls filled with posters reminding patients that U.S. News & World Report ranked it one of America’s top hospitals, a Harvard of healing. Partly I was there as a reporter, finishing work on a book about the efforts of technoscientists to use genes, nanotechnology, and other new disciplines to keep us alive and young forever. But mostly I was there as a recent arrival at that milestone that is 40, ready for my first real overhaul—an “executive physical,” they call it. Looked at another way, I was there for my entrance exam into a statistical universe I’ll inhabit for the rest of my life.



Your first four decades are the random decades. Maybe you slip on that patch of ice, maybe your SUV rolls into a ditch. But nothing medically serious happens to a large enough group of people to amount to a statistic worth knowing; the leading causes of death are still things like accidents, homicide, suicide, infectious disease. But slowly, subtly, sometime around midlife, your particular data points start to arrange themselves on the larger human curve. Flukes settle into probabilities, percentages. The doctor wants to start tracking your good cholesterol, your bad cholesterol. If you are a male, this new world hits home the first time someone in a white coat puts a glove on and tells you to bend over. (“Mildly enlarged,” my Lahey doctor, internist John Przybylski, told me. “You have to get up at night to pee? That’s your prostate knocking at the door.”) By the end of my day at Lahey, after I’d been through half a dozen tests—from X-ray (obvious signs of arthritis around my lowest vertebra) to colonoscopy to allergy (lung capacity starting to decrease)—the avuncular Dr. P. promised we’d be able to calculate how likely I was to die of a heart attack by the age of 50.


My results were not all that startling, or all that bad, just the first inexorable signs of what could only be termed decline. All on schedule—but that was the point. My body was now on a schedule. “We’re here to talk to you about the next 40 or 50 years of your life,” the doctor said as he picked up my chart. Looking a little more closely at the dates, he corrected himself subtly: “The next 30 or 40 or 50 years of your life.”


THIS, OF COURSE, is the great boomer bummer. Most of us alive today can reasonably expect to live to 75, while at the turn of the last century the average American dropped dead at 47. But that great leap in life expectancy won’t repeat itself in this millennium—it came with revolutions in sanitation and antibiotics. Even if we wiped out cancer, we’d add only a couple of years to the average lifespan. But that doesn’t mean we’re going quietly into the good night. Not us—we’re entitled; we’ve got technology. Never mind Viagra. It gets way, way weirder than that.


A confluence of new technological developments has suddenly led some from this generation to imagine that there might be an escape clause, a way out of mortality altogether. It doesn’t take much poking around the techie Web sites to find people dreaming hard about physical immortality. And their dreams sound increasingly more like science fiction than science.


Consider, for example, Dr. Michael West, the head of a Massachusetts company called Advanced Cell Technology, which in 2001 (a year before the Raelian UFO cult’s Clonaid claimed to have done so) cloned a human embryo. West didn’t grow it into a baby, partly because he has other things in mind. Some of those things involve curing diseases—he’d like to harvest stem cells from cloned embryos to see if they’re of use in the fight against, say, Parkinson’s disease. But right about there, West parts company with what we normally consider medicine. He has told one interviewer after another that what he’s really interested in is keeping humans alive—and young—forever. A team of biologists who worked for him at another corporation managed to synthesize telomerase, the enzyme that keeps cells from dying off after so many divisions. Now he’s imagining “making body components one by one,” each of them “made young by cloning. Then our body would be made young again segmentally, like an antique car is restored by exchanging failed components.”
Such sentiments are not uncommon. At a conference on advanced technology in 1999, University of California at San Francisco molecular geneticist Cynthia Kenyon explained how she had dramatically extended the lives of a class of worms. It was, she told her fellow researchers, as if a nonagenarian suddenly looked forty-something. “Just imagine it: I’m 90,” said the 45-year-old scientist. And if genes won’t do the whole trick, researchers are ready with a wide array of other plans. Nanotechnologists—who manipulate matter at the atomic and molecular levels—believe that their tiny machines will soon be able to patrol the bloodstream, constantly repairing damage and eventually replacing all the functions of the circulatory system. When a nanotechnologist was asked in a recent New York Times article if he would miss the beat of the unneeded heart, he said no: “The noise in my ears keeps me up when I try to go to sleep.”


A few years ago, Alcor Life Extension Foundation, the Scottsdale, ArizonaÃbased cryonics company that is reportedly storing Red Sox legend Ted Williams’s frozen carcass, was investigated for freezing the head of an 83-year-old woman before she was declared legally dead. Alcor’s attorney called in depositions from top scientists; Eric Drexler, the father of nanotechnology, asserted that “future medicine will one day be able to build cells, tissues, and organs to repair damaged tissues.” Hans Moravec, head of the Mobile Robot Laboratory at Carnegie Mellon University’s Robotics Institute, in Pittsburgh, took the idea further. “It requires only a moderately liberal extrapolation of present technical trends,” he said, “to admit the future possibility of reversing the effects of particular diseases, of aging, and of death, as currently defined.”


It is at least possible, in other words, that we stand somewhere near the dawn of that great human dream, life eternal. So why does it sound a little…nasty?


ALWAYS BEFORE, life has meant passing through. Making way for those who will come after. Coming to terms with decline. Living intensely in the moments we get. Accepting that the day will come when, instead of telemarking off the icy cornice, we’ll rock by the fire and remember telemarking off the icy cornice. Understanding that, like everything before us, we will rot our way back into the woof and warp of the planet. That’s what humans are: animals that can anticipate their demise.


And being human has always meant being, in some irreducible way, yourself. Not a genetically programmed machine designed for maximum performance, not an interface with silicon or with nanomachines giving you more power by orders of magnitude. That basic identification—I am me—is the reason that, in the end, activities like sports have real meaning. Otherwise it doesn’t mean much to accomplish anything, because who is it doing the accomplishing?


Think I’m exaggerating? The same theorists working to get rid of the human heart are also busy imagining sports the new breed of humans—or semi-robots—might want to play. “This could be an especially interesting prospect for highly dangerous activities you might not otherwise have the nerve to try,” writes nanotech pioneer Robert Freitas in his essay “The Birth of the Cyborg.” Boxing, parachuting, mountaineering. In such a world, people could “feel reckless,” Freitas says, “without risking personal harm.” Without, in other words, it meaning a thing. You could be Super Mario.


OR YOU COULD CHOOSE otherwise and be yourself. As the afternoon at Lahey wore on, there was one exam left: the stress test. I stripped down to my shorts while a pretty nurse shaved my chest and hooked me up to a set of monitors. I climbed aboard the treadmill and began to walk, in accordance with the standard Bruce protocol for the Treadmill Exercise Stress Test, beginning at 1.7 miles per hour on a 10 percent grade and getting steeper and harder every three minutes. But—and this will amaze health club athletes—you get to hold on to the front bar. It’s true that by the time the 21 minutes were up, my forearms were cramping. But it’s also true that I was going six miles per hour up a 22 percent grade. And I was still able to wheeze “No problem” every time the nurse asked me how I was doing. I aced the test—me, my own out-the-door-every-afternoon-for-a-run-bike-ski self.



“Now I’ll be able to say yes when people ask if anyone’s ever gotten all the way through,” the nurse said. Could one impress pretty nurses with a nonbeating nanoheart? Could one impress oneself? When I sat down with the doctor, we looked over all my numbers and calculated that there was a 3 percent chance I’d die of a coronary before the decade was out. Three percent’s not nothing, and in the next decade it will get higher, and the decade after that, and then, by God, it will someday happen. But I’ll take it. I can deal with being a real human.


The post Mr. Natural appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Across the Disappearing Finishing Line /outdoor-adventure/across-disappearing-finishing-line/ Wed, 01 Nov 2000 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/across-disappearing-finishing-line/ Searching for the keys to endurance, a ski racer pushes his body and heart to the limit—until his father's sudden illness changes all the rules

The post Across the Disappearing Finishing Line appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>

BARRING THE ODD World War or Depression, being a man was once a fairly simple task. My grandfather, for instance, lived to be a well-adjusted 95—he visited Costa Rica on a banana boat at 90—by walking a few brisk miles every morning and avoiding between-meals snacks.

But it’s not so easy anymore. Here are some things you need to know if you’re going to be a healthy man, according to a recent issue of Men’s Health: Chronic, day-to-day work stress can lower your sperm count by a third; a diet rich in garlic keeps your aorta flexible; vitamin B2 fights off migraines; shrinking your waist from 40 inches to 37 inches cuts diabetes risk in half; you can build your triceps by doing dips off the edge of a swimming pool; if you’re determined to have sex in an elevator, a spokesman for the American Elevator and Machine Corporation recommends using a freight elevator (“Many lack security cameras, but check the ceiling to make sure”). Not only that—but negative sit-ups can build abdominal muscles faster than crunches.

None of this would surprise women. For a long time—say, three or four million years—being a woman was hard work. But sometime around 1985, when men in their underwear began reclining on Times Square billboards, manhood became nearly as time-consuming. A sampling of Men’s Fitness covers over the past year promises “24 Ways to Customize Your Physique,” “6 Dangerous Foods,” “12 Instant Nutrition Fixes,” “7 Best Biceps Builders,” “Better Sex—10 Ways to Drive Them Insane,” “7 Super Shakes for Peak Energy,” “5 Awesome Back Wideners,” “5 Ready-Made Seduction Dates,” “20 Hospital Survival Tips,” “6 Moves for Bigger Arms,” and “50 Ways to Improve Your Life—Guaranteed.”

I’d never paid much attention to this kind of thing before the winter of 1998, when at the age of 37 I embarked on, well, a quest (one whose early months I chronicled in ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø in February 1999). I decided to spend a year training pretty much full-time to be a cross-country ski racer—I knew I wouldn’t win any races, but I wanted to understand my mind and body in new ways, before age closed certain doors. Maybe I was tired of living mainly through my head; maybe I was just freaked to be growing old. In any event, I found a coach, Rob Sleamaker, author of Serious Training for Endurance Athletes, who drew up a yearlong program that called for more than 600 hours of training—daily two-, three, four-hour runs and skis, long bouts of uphill sprinting, my heart-rate monitor bleating softly all the while. Add to that endless sets of crunches and biceps curls and triceps extensions, and before much time had passed, muscles—not underwear ad–size muscles, but still—actually began to appear on my formerly smooth body.

And vanity began to infect my formerly oblivious consciousness. I found myself posing in front of the mirror as I shaved—flexing my pecs so they’d pop up and down, tensing my butt (my glutes, I mean) when I showered, feeling the indentations in my upper arm that marked the birth of my triceps. You couldn’t really make out my washboard abs, but I could count the ridges of riblike muscle whenever I tightened my stomach. I read Arnold Schwarzenegger’s 1977 autobiography, Arnold: The Education of a Bodybuilder, with new understanding.

Unlike Arnold’s, however, the veins in my arms bulged like phone cords, not tug lines; my forearms bloomed from celery stalks to broccoli stalks. My wife, Sue, was the only one to notice I was sprouting muscle mass, and even she, in my opinion, paid far too little attention to the details of my emergent triceps. Of course, endurance athletes are not supposed to Popeye up—more muscle takes more blood to feed it, eventually reducing your efficiency. Still, self-image matters, I was finding out. As a boy, resolutely unphysical, I supposed I should exercise in order to get girls. I got girls anyway; eventually I got married and fathered a child and so fulfilled my genetic mandate, and the fact that I couldn’t reliably open pickle jars did not prevent my DNA from passing down yea unto the generations.

And yet did I measure up to my forebears, those sturdy small-town Westerners, on the manliness scale? My father, growing up, had spent his summers at a log cabin on the edge of Mount Rainier—a place without lights or running water, in the shadow of the great Douglas firs. We’d visit the cabin every few years on some vacation driving trip, and usually we’d find my cousin Craig there. A mountaineer, Craig was forever heading off to Pakistan or Baffin Island or some other place with high icy cliffs to conquer. Sometimes he’d open his pack to show us his collection of carabiners, pitons, and ropes. Dad loved it—this was his fantasy life, long before Everest-mania. But he’d reared us in the cushy suburbs of the East, where SATs counted more than sit-ups, and sometimes it seemed to me as if I was devolving, defying Darwin.

That summer, as I roller-skied and ran and lifted and interval-trained in preparation for the winter race season, Mom and Dad celebrated their 40th anniversary. Dad had recently retired after a lifetime as a journalist, and the whole family joined them at a slightly down-at-the-heels resort in the White Mountains that offered a shaggy nine-hole golf course out back. It was a great pleasure that summer to head out onto the green with my dad and my younger brother, Tom. I’d never played before, and I had no swing; they had to show me how to grip the club. But when I connected I had power—the ball would sail away into the middle distance. It didn’t bother me that it went left or right or onto the neighboring fairway. I just liked the idea that it went long and strong.

THE MORE I TRAINED, and especially the more I began to race, the more I understood that my mind needed toughening at least as much as my body—that endurance was about going until it hurt, when the natural impulse was to slow down, and then deciding whether to listen to that impulse or not. Not long after my golf date with Dad, I went off to Australia, which has the planet’s best August snow, eager to test out my hepped-up lungs. I’ll never forget the morning of the Paddy Pallin Classic, a 25-kilometer race through the twisted snow gums and eucalyptus trees on the shoulder of 7,310-foot Mount Kosciusko, the continent’s highest peak. I remember exactly how good it felt when the gun went off, how I bounded up the hills on my new legs, how I fantasized about catching the wave of skiers who had started five minutes before me—and how immediately I lost all that sweet focus at the first real sign of adversity. A racer came blowing by me, my chest tightened, and suddenly I was just plodding along, concentration gone. I still had some work to do.

But there’d been enough glimpses of transformation—races where for a few minutes I’d drop into the inescapable now of competition—to keep me going. When I came back from Australia, I began the longest, hardest month of my training schedule, an endless September that peaked one Saturday morning with a 238-minute run. My parents were visiting our Adirondack home, and they offered to watch my six-year-old daughter, Sophie, while I worked out. I ran and ran and ran some more, finally stumble-charging up the last rise, congratulating myself that from now on the whole year was downhill. I was peeling off my T-shirt and savoring the smug aura of finishing something hard when I noticed Dad. He was about a hundred yards away from Mom, walking back and forth, and he was lurching a bit. “He’s testing himself,” she said, with a frantic edge in her voice.

Slowly the story started to come out. In August he’d been hiking hard in the Cascades, feeling fine. But when he got home he’d begun stumbling a bit—and once fell right over. Some days, Mom added, he slurred his words. Dad had chalked it up to the late-summer humidity, or perhaps a sinus infection, and had rallied (and reassured) himself by walking faster, working up a sweat. But when I took him aside that afternoon he confessed that his right side felt weak. Could I have had a small stroke? he asked me. As soon as he said it, I felt myself starting to panic—it had never even entered my mind that at 68 he’d start to decline. But I knew it must be true; it would explain the balance, the speech, even a few recent mild displays of uncharacteristic temper.

I bade my parents good-bye with a sour taste in the back of my throat. The next day Dad phoned from home in Boston to say that his doctor was convinced that indeed he’d had a very mild stroke. He’d scheduled an MRI for later in the week just to make sure, but he told Mom and Dad to go ahead planning a trip to Mexico; I could tell from his voice that Dad was immensely relieved.

And I was too. I spent a little time thinking about the Meaning of It All—how your body would eventually betray you no matter how fit you got—and then I went back to work, because racing season was coming into distant view. The weather began to change; a front came through one of those early autumn nights, dropping temperatures down into the low thirties, threatening the tomatoes. The weatherman talked about “the possibility of sleet or snow on the high ridges.” The S word hadn’t been heard in these parts since early May, and it made me quiver inside.

I started stacking firewood in earnest that week, and while I was working Friday afternoon I looked up to see our dog, Barley, trotting toward me with something in her mouth. At first I thought it was a shoe, but when she dropped it for me I saw it was a hawk—dead, but utterly unmarked, a broad-wing, all strength and sinew. Sophie and I spread its strong, gray feathers, examined its powerful beak and talons, and then wrapped it in plastic and put it in the freezer so that she could take it to school. I went back to the woodpile.

When I looked up a few minutes later, Sue was standing there in the fading light with tears running down her cheeks. My mom had just called. Dad had a brain tumor, “an aggressive nonbenign tumor.” They were operating on Tuesday. Just like that.

I hugged her for a long time, and then headed straight out into the woods, cursing and crying and carrying on. Mom said the doctor had told them that even with the operation “the long-term average survival” was 12 months, which put a new spin on the whole idea of long-term. For me, 12 months was a “training cycle.” I was still sobbing when Dad came on the phone. “This is ridiculous, isn’t it?” he said with a rueful chuckle. He’d been shaving when I called, and for some reason that made me even sadder. How do you manage to look in the mirror when someone has just told you that in a year you won’t be there?

A couple of weeks before, I’d visited some actuarial Web site that let you calculate your likely life span. Didn’t smoke, long-lived relatives, plenty of exercise, low cholesterol—when I tapped the final button it told me I was going to die at 93. I’m certain that Dad would have gotten the same result. He was strong and active; he’d just written his first book. But there was no little button on the actuarial table for something called glioblastoma, the most virulent form of brain cancer.

When we got to Boston the next day, the change was obvious. Six days earlier his speech had been a little slurred. Three days earlier he’d driven to church and chaired a meeting. Today, Saturday, his triumph had been walking the 20 yards to the Adirondack chairs in the backyard. His world was shrinking with incomprehensible speed. He told us about finding out the bad news: The surgeon had pronounced his death sentence, and then said he should choose. “I could get a big bottle of Scotch and have a wonderful last night before going into a coma, or I could have this surgery and that would keep me going a little longer.”

THE NIGHT BEFORE Dad went to the hospital, as I was taking off his slippers to put him to bed, I could see the hard, veiny calves that only a month ago were powering him up high mountains in his native Northwest. They were useless now. Was he useless? What did it mean to lose your body in a week? And what would it mean, 24 hours hence, to lose some large chunk of your mind?

That next morning, at the hospital, Dad passed into another, yet-smaller world, where his abilities meant nothing. When the surgeon finally came for his pre-op visit, Dad asked only one question: “Will my personality change?”

“I hope not,” the doctor said.

We watched as they wheeled him out of his room to the operating theater. It was after lunch before the doctor appeared to give us the news. Dad had come through surgery OK, but the pathology was exactly what he suspected: glioblastoma, grade four. The worst grade. He couldn’t get it all, it had already spread to both lobes. Sorry. The next few months, the doctor said, would be “the good time,” a phrase that would come to haunt us.

When they finally let us up to see him, Dad looked…beautiful. A turban of bandages wrapped his head, but beneath it his face was eerily young, as if he were in his twenties. The sparkle was back in his eyes. When we turned on the TV the Red Sox were leading the Indians in game one of their playoff series behind seven RBIs from Mo Vaughn. Dad was making jokes—he whose head had been sawed open and then the two halves pulled apart by traction. This much was clear: His personality had not changed, not one whit. Doubtless it would darken when the tumor recurred, when the swelling built up again. The hope, though, was that we’d bought ourselves a few months, a window of time to make peace with his passing. Nothing more.

And so we settled into the pattern of small victories and somewhat larger defeats that must mark most terminal illness. They shifted Dad to a “rehabilitation hospital” in the suburbs, where after daily morning trips by ambulance to the radiation ward he would return for afternoons of physical therapy. The therapy rooms reminded me of the world where I’d spent much of the last year—they were filled with weight machines, parallel bars, treadmills. But here, in place of the ersatz philosophy of the gym, real struggle prevailed. Dad’s workouts, as tightly scheduled and as exhausting as mine, involved batting a balloon back and forth with the therapist, folding washcloths, unscrewing a jar top, kicking a ball. He could swing his right foot perhaps an inch, enough to nudge the ball along the floor, but no more. When he tried to steer his wheelchair, it inevitably drifted to the right till he hit a wall, reflecting the now-distorted architecture of his brain. His major triumph: learning to apply and disengage the wheelchair brake.

Through it all I kept running. I suppose I should have stopped, if only because it seemed in such poor taste, calibrating my body’s improvement as Dad’s withered away. But Dad had been the most interested in my project from the beginning. And there was nothing else to structure my life. No one expected me at an office. I was commuting between the Adirondacks and Boston, between my adult and boyhood homes (I was sleeping on the bed I’d slept on as a boy, the same bed Dad had slept on in his youth). There was no way I could write—when I tried to still my mind enough to string two thoughts together, I invariably began to weep. Only motion seemed to relax me.

I’d begun this compulsive exercising on the premise that I was at the tail end of my youth. Now it was all too easy to calculate that if I lived as long as my father was going to, I was already halfway used up. But I could feel the second half of my life starting in more complicated ways too. Identities long fixed shifted back and forth. Sometimes I was still his son. But then the next morning would dawn, and we’d need yet again to make some impossible decision: more radiation, say. Dad would doze off while the doctor was explaining the options, and we’d be left trying to figure out what he might want, what we might want. The goal of all the physical therapy diminished. Instead of teaching him to regain real function in his muscles, the single aim became training him to help in the process of transferring himself from bed to wheelchair, and vice versa. If he learned that, he could go home and Mom could take care of him by herself. The technique, as detailed and precise as a good cross-country skiing kick, involved lifting his butt an inch up off the bed and then sliding himself in two stages about a foot and a half into the wheelchair. He would push himself up on his knuckles, slide ten inches, rest 30 seconds till the panting subsided, then make the next assault. Each time he’d forget the sequence and need to be reminded; each time it left him red-faced and tired.

All this training, and for what? It wasn’t like my training. I knew I was getting steadily stronger and fitter. Not Dad. He worked all afternoon stretching his rubber bands, lifting his tiny dumbbells, and yet his body decayed faster than he could build it up.

I went in to the rehab center one morning and found him in an uncharacteristic rage. Some doctor had wandered through that morning (one of the glories of managed care was that unknown doctors constantly drifted in and out of our lives) and remarked to him, on the basis of a handshake, that he was getting weaker. Dad was outraged, agitated. He didn’t want to go to therapy that afternoon, but I talked him into it.

You followed your schedule no matter what; sometimes that seemed about all my year had taught me.

IF I NEEDED A metaphor for my autumn, it came in early November. Back in the Adirondacks for a week, I noticed some fresh new pavement on a back road on the far side of the Hudson River. Fresh pavement, to a roller-skier, exerts a nearly gravitational pull—smooth and fast, it’s the next best thing to snow. What I hadn’t noticed was just how steep the hills were. I was, as always, wearing a bike helmet, but I’d forgotten my knee pads, and the light was fading. Predictably, I went for it. For an hour I skied the hills, tucking for fast descents, powering up with short, choppy kicks, feeling pretty damn strong. And then, predictably, a dog ran out at the bottom of a hill just as a car passed on my left—and I was down in a second.

Predictably, I jumped up, in the way that guys do when they’ve fallen, as if to say, Oh, I meant to do that. I waved off the stricken driver—and as soon as he was out of sight I sat right back down to consider. True, my knees were bleeding dramatically, soaking my shredded tights, but on the other hand I had 90 minutes left in my workout. I’d snapped a pole, so I clearly wasn’t going to keep skiing, but I had my sneakers in the car. And so—predictably?—I ran, knees bleeding and stiff. It was clearly stupid. Perhaps I just wanted to hurt, and to keep going through the hurt.

My road-scraped knees healed just in time for me to return to Lake Placid and the giant treadmill at the Olympic Training Center for the final readout on my year’s training. I’d passed through this particular crucible in the spring, establishing my baseline numbers and learning just how much the test could hurt—you ran until you couldn’t run anymore, or at least until you thought you couldn’t. This time, rubber bit clenched in my mouth to catch my exhalations, I lasted two minutes longer than I had in April, but it didn’t cheer me up. Because I knew I’d had another minute in me, if only I’d fought the pain a little harder. But when the treadmill tilted toward the gut-check stage, I couldn’t keep going. It hurt, that’s why.

My coach, Rob, professed delight. “You’ve had a 45 percent improvement in body fat, your lactate threshold is 25 percent better—your engine is burning hotter at a lower lactate production. It means you can ski at a faster pace longer.” Part of me did feel exhilarated. It had worked the way it was supposed to, all those hours and miles. Mine was not the physique of a champion, but what I had done was maximize my genetic potential, grown about as powerful as my ancestry would allow.

But the day left me feeling unsettled. When things had gotten really tough, I had looked for a way out. My heart might have become more efficient, but my heart seemed no stronger.

Maybe it was because I was beginning to question whether endurance was such a grand goal anyhow.

From the moment I’d learned of Dad’s first conversation with the surgeon—Scotch or scalpel—part of me had been wondering whether we should be keeping him alive. We’d press the specialists with questions about whether his condition would improve, and all we’d get was the Ph.D. equivalent of shrugs. In the meantime, he was home, enduring, and Mom was, too. The HMO professed to believe that a couple of hours of nursing assistance a day was all Mom needed; never mind that Dad outweighed her by 80 or 90 pounds. She hired extra aides to come in the evening and help her get him out of bed; the next-door neighbor’s son slept upstairs now just in case he rolled out of bed and she couldn’t get him back in. New pills piled up almost daily; dosages changed with every visit to the doctor; Mom was awake by six to give him his first medicines, and still up at midnight to feed him the final batch. When I thought about the burden she was under, I doubted I could handle anything like it. And yet she kept going forward, forward, forward, like—well, like an elite athlete. In her case, though, it wasn’t uphill intervals and mental imagery that had laid the base. It was year upon year of loving, so consistently that the giving had become instinctive.

As for me, if watching someone die could perform the same kind of magic, I wasn’t sure I was ready for it. When the treadmill got steep enough, I started looking around for someone to turn it off.

Whenever we were with the doctors, no matter how much of a fog he seemed to be in, Dad would ask that they treat his cancer “aggressively.” But one night, when I was talking to him very late, he said, “If it’s going to be like this all the time, then there has to be a cutoff somewhere.” Amen, I thought. Where’s the guy with the switch?

WE MADE IT TO THANKSGIVING, and I spent the week in West Yellowstone—my longest absence from his bedside so far, a guilty vacation—at the annual cross-country training camp that fills the town with gaunt, wax-obsessed nordic racers trying to cope with the 6,600-foot altitude. I flew home on Friday, though, for a delayed turkey dinner, where we managed to convince ourselves that we had much to be thankful for and that, with Dad propped up at table’s end, all was joy. After the pie settled, I went for a run and instantly understood why athletes are so eager to train at altitude. My body had compensated for the thin Montana air by adding extra red blood cells. I ran through suburban Boston on a high—no matter how hard I pushed, I couldn’t make myself hurt. My heart-rate monitor showed I was working reasonably hard, but I could have been out for the lightest of jogs. I felt out ahead of my body, as if I was outrunning my feet.

Sadly, the corpuscles quickly disappeared, and with them the sense that I had become a minor deity. Worse than that, the East was still warm and bare as December began. The temperature hit the seventies on the first of the month. The pond by our house was filled with summery ripples. No need for the woodstove; we slept with the windows open.

It bothered me on many levels. For ten years I’d been a nearly full-time student of global warming—worrying, tracking the rising sea temperatures that were bleaching coral reefs, writing about the increase in the strength and frequency of hurricanes. But I felt it most personally come winter. Always my favorite of seasons, it had become deeply unreliable. As the man from Fischer Skis had told me in West Yellowstone, global warming had already damaged their business, interrupting every winter with long stretches of mud and thaw. Business would doubtless carry on; in fact, I’d just come across a series of economic forecasts proving, in the smug fashion of economists, that increases in the greens fees from golfers would outweigh the losses from declining ski sales. But I didn’t want to play golf—I wanted to speed sublimely through the woods, riding on an outstretched ski, pushing with every muscle in my body. I wanted the annual remission from friction.

Rob had been pushing me to pick a final race to aim for, something grand enough to be worthy of this whole experiment—and he’d been urging me to think about the Norwegian Birkebeiner, the mother of all cross-country races, held each March on a course that runs over the mountains from Rena to Lillehammer. Open to all comers, it attracts thousands of Norwegians, and most of the world’s best marathon skiers. As they race, they commemorate the pivotal event in Norway’s 13th-century civil war. The Birkebeiners—Birchleggers—were the underdogs, “often in such dire need that they had nothing but the bark of birch trees as footwear.” But they were determined that the rival faction, the Baglers, not capture Haakon Haakonsson, the toddler son of their dying king. So on Christmas Day 1205, two Birkebeiner skiers spirited him away on an epic journey across the mountains. The boy grew up to be King Haakon and to finally rout the Baglers, raising Norway to its medieval glory. And hence, each year in late March, racers pound those same grueling 58 kilometers, about 40 miles, mostly uphill, each carrying an eight-pound pack to match the weight of the young king.

I doubted I could go. With Dad dying, the prospect of a trans-atlantic trip seemed unlikely. And I wondered if I could even finish the race. But I still logged onto the race Web site and clicked the button for an application. Maybe Dad would get better for a while—maybe the “good time” would arrive. I knew I wanted to go; it sounded crazy, hard enough to justify this crazy year.

This crazy year in which winter seemed never to come. By mid-December we’d set up the Christmas tree at church and gone caroling in shirtsleeves. Finally, December 17 brought a little snow to the Adirondacks, and a few phone calls established that the Olympic trails at Lake Placid were partially open. They were barely covered, but it was skiing, and I kicked around and around the same short loops with the junior biathletes, guns strapped to their backs, and the local masters skiers, all of us desperate for snow. The next day warm, foggy air melted big tawny patches in the snow, and it was back to the damn NordicTrack. December was shot.

We got through Christmas Day in Boston just fine—a lot of the ornaments hung at wheelchair height, testament to Dad’s pleasure in the work—but then, tired from the strain of this last big celebration, Dad was all but comatose for a couple of days. “Were it my dad,” said the surgeon, “I wouldn’t do much more.”

At which point Dad emerged from his fog for the first time all day to ask yet again that he be treated “aggressively.” Which annoyed the hell out of me—some part of me wanted him to go away and stop bothering us. Stop making me feel guilty for not being more help to my mother; stop pulling me away from my family; stop stop stop being so damn needy, so unlike my father. Which, of course, left me feeling twice as guilty as before.

A snowstorm might have righted me. It usually does. A couple of hours alone in the woods, gliding along, pushing up hills and carving down them, breaking out into the open on Adirondack lakes and tucking back into stands of hemlock, reminding me of the proper order and scale of things.

BY LATE JANUARY THE GROUND was still bare, and Dad was setting off on a major journey. Each day he seemed to grow a bit more abstracted from his shrinking world. He was never short with any of us. If his grandchildren were on hand, he would watch them playing around his bed with deep delight, and he never ceased following Mom with his eyes.

Sometimes the world he was visiting seemed inscrutable. Once I asked him what he was thinking so deeply about, and he replied, in a loud voice, “Insects!” But he did tell Mom several times that he constantly saw a white line in front of his eyes. One morning, when he was more alert than usual and when we had the house to ourselves, I asked him if he could describe the line to me. He asked for a pencil and, gripping it tightly in his shaking hand, drew a wavering line about two-thirds of the way across the page and labeled it R. On the edge of the paper, he drew a wavering circle and with great effort wrote “W. Ocean” across it. (In a lifetime of writing, they were the last words he ever wrote.) The picture represented, he said, a “typical Western river” leading to a “Western ocean.”

“And what does that ocean mean?” I asked.

“Infinity,” he said. “Completeness.”

He nodded off for a few moments and then woke back up. Why didn’t the river connect to the ocean? I asked.

There were, he said, necessary tasks still to be done, but he couldn’t find the words to say what they were.

“Is death more scary to think about or more peaceful?” I asked.

“More peaceful,” he said emphatically, and then drifted back to sleep.

That night at dinner he seemed happy—we’d been discussing “ultimate truths,” he told Mom, with just a little smile to let us know he knew how unlike him it was to discuss ultimate truths. But a new man was clearly taking shape before our eyes.

MY OWN JOURNEY seemed all but irrelevant, dull even to me, but by now the training was so ingrained that I kept with it almost automatically. And Rob, the one person besides my wife whom I’d trusted with my resolve to mount a supreme effort in some race, kept trying to help me find the right venue.

The trip to Lillehammer seemed less likely than ever, but I came across a brochure for the annual Keskinada races in Ottawa, in late February. The theme for 1999 was Norway; they were trying to duplicate parts of the Birkebeiner in Canada, including sending off one wave of racers carrying eight-pound backpacks. Ottawa was only a quick trip from Boston; this one I figured I could make. And so the images that filled my mind on training runs were suddenly Canadian: the pine forests of the Gatineau Park, the 50-kilometer trail. There was finally a little snow on the ground, and Rob told me to prepare with a four-hour time trial two weeks before the race. Four hours is a long time, especially with none of the adrenaline of a race to distract you; I headed to the ski tracks and did the same five-kilometer loop 11 times, till I knew every soft spot in the snow. Every lap brought me by a pigpen filled with noisy hogs; I’d stop there and choke down some energy gel. When the clock finally stopped, I’d gone 55 kilometers, and proved to myself that at the very least I could manage the distances in the race ahead. And I’d done it with my pack on my back, like a true Birchlegger.

Almost in spite of myself, I could feel my body starting to peak. As the really long workouts of the fall dwindled in number and distance, and the brutal intervals built up my speed, power began to accumulate. I imagined that I knew what a racehorse felt like in the gate, pent-up energy ready to express itself. Long, hard uphill skiing left me feeling spent but not wasted; my body craved fuel and burned it evenly; I was eager for a test, impatient for the Ottawa race to arrive. I was, in fact, in the best physical shape of my life.

In the middle of all this, my friend John Race came to visit. We’d met when he guided me up Mount Rainier five years before. Intellectually curious the way I was physically curious, he’d nonetheless spent almost all his energy on things of the body and the spirit. He’d spent months on Mount McKinley, gotten within 500 feet of the top of Everest, climbed 26,000-foot peaks like Cho Oyu. Now he was hungry for intellectual growth, and he wanted to write about his experiences. He was playing on the path I’d been following since I could first remember, and I was playing on his. It made me think of the first notion Rob had taught me when we’d started working together a year before—each of us born to be balanced physically, intellectually, and spiritually.

It hadn’t taken me long to figure out how linked all three could be. If exercise was about being physical, then racing—being willing to hurt, to go harder than you wanted to—had an obvious spiritual quality. But the neat progression of my idea ran into trouble when Dad got sick. He was clearly operating at some higher level now, but it wasn’t because he was trying. Instead, it seemed to be because he was letting go. Not giving up, not dropping out, but slowly, methodically, patiently letting go of his life. Every so often, I kept trying to ask serious questions, to find out what was going on inside. Partly it was just my curiosity, but I sensed, too, that he enjoyed talking about it, liked the fact that someone acknowledged he was dying and that it was an interesting process. One day he muttered that he was trying to figure out if there was something beyond this “make-believe” world, if there was something beyond “next week.” His metaphors, like the drawing of the river, tended always toward the outdoor, the concrete, toward the joys of the Western boyhood that had filled his imagination ever since. “I feel like I’m climbing,” he told me slowly one day. “Like I’m climbing up a cliff.”

“Are you near the top?” I asked.

“Getting there,” he said, with a grin.

I thought of all the climbs we’d taken when I was young, in the mountains of Maine and New Hampshire; of the pleasure he’d taken in the Adirondacks when I moved there; of the long trip we’d taken with his brother and my brother around Mount Rainier. Every time I’d looked at him in those weeks on the Wonderland Trail, he’d been grinning. Climbing wasn’t a struggle for him, didn’t represent a battle or even a test. It was a great joy, because it carried you higher, to where the view was clearer. And more than that—though the grand view may have started you slogging in the first place, no one kept hiking for years unless they came to like the slog. Sometimes it’s bittersweet to reach the top, because there’s nothing to do but linger for a while and go back down. This time, however, he wouldn’t need to descend.

I’d started this exercise of exercising in an effort to try on a new identity, the way a high school boy might try on meanness, or a college boy might grow a goatee. But now, watching Dad, I realized what a solid thing an identity is. He was unchanged even by this catastrophe—he remained as decent and egoless a man as I’d ever met. As for me, I’d examined my core from a different side, or placed it under light of a different wavelength, and found it to be much as I’d always known it: curious, eager, tempted by deep commitment but afraid of the effort and pain.

I could live with that—it had served me well so far—but now I wondered if I could die with that. Wondered if I could go as gracefully as my father was going, as bravely and yet as peacefully. What would it be like to reach the end of my life without regrets?

Dad took one last trip into the hospital, for one last MRI. The tumor had fired up again, the doctors said, started once more to grow. Don’t even bother calling the ambulance if something happens, they advised—you don’t want them sticking a tube down his throat. Mom listened, asked Dad if he had anything to say.

He looked up, and in a clear, conver-sational tone announced, “I have this fascinating vision of a white line along the edge of a riverbank.”

SO THERE WAS DAD, cheerful in the face of a brain tumor. And here I was, gloomy because I’d caught a cold two days before the big race in Ottawa, and was reduced to obsessively guzzling tea, sucking on zinc tablets, and fretting about compromised respiratory efficiency. But on race morning I was up at 5:45, and I was the first to arrive at Gatineau Park. I splurged $30 at the ski-waxing booth and watched the ski techs patiently iron on purple and red and then a coat of klister because the tracks were icy. I took my skis outside, tried them for a few strides, and instantly felt my mood soaring—I had rock-solid kick and lustrous glide. They felt like perfect extensions of my legs, each twitch converted into forward momentum.

The starting pen for my wave filled with other backpack-carrying skiers, about 40 of us among the hundreds of more conventional racers. An official weighed the rucksacks, making sure they topped the infant-king-Haakon line on the scale. We shuffled back and forth in the tracks for a few minutes, trying to stay limber, until the Norwegian ambassador to Canada sounded the ceremonial horn and we took off.

Because of the packs, it was easy enough to keep my competition in sight. We hit the first long uphill, and my legs felt so strong I had to consciously rein myself in a little, remind myself I’d be out on the course for a good three hours. One by one I picked off the guys in my wave—a fellow carrying a blaze-orange knapsack, a fellow in camouflage Lycra, a fast-looking skier who somehow managed to fall on the first small downhill. Twenty minutes into the race, a fellow in a brown rucksack was in front of me, and I was pretty sure he was either second or third in my wave—in other words, if I passed him I’d be in the money. I stayed on his tail for a few minutes, pulling abreast occasionally, even chatting for a while to let him know the pace wasn’t hurting me. And I passed him.

After that I was skiing by myself. The hills just kept on coming, and my form began gradually to erode; by the halfway point I was laboring. I stopped for a drink of water and a ClifShot, and the people manning the table seemed concerned. “You’re shivering,” said one. “Are you hypothermic?” Before they could ask again, I skied off.

At some point along the course, a photographer crouched, taking pictures of everyone coming by so that he could try to sell them at the banquet that night. Through his lens, I was just one more tired-looking guy stuck somewhere in the middle of an unimportant race. And yet for me it was an epic. I crouched down in my tuck and let my muscles recover for a few minutes as the trail tilted downhill. Then came a long flat. Finally, at about 40 kilometers, the trail turned back on itself, and for about 500 yards you could see the skiers right behind you. Oh, God—one had a brown backpack, the same fellow I’d passed nearly two hours before, now right on my tail, maybe 40 seconds behind. Worse, my limbs were slowing down—I couldn’t muster more than a sluggish kick. I could feel myself about to give up, about to be passed, about to turn normal.

And then I didn’t. I made it up one hill and coasted down the other side; after that, though I was shaky and absolutely drained, I managed to go hard. Not fast. But fast enough, because I was still passing people. Fast enough, because every time I looked over my shoulder, the tracks were clear. Eventually there was a sign by the trail and it said: “Finish 1,000 Meters.” Did a thousand meters mean a kilometer? Ten kilometers? My hypoxic brain fuzzed the question around until suddenly the trail spit out onto an open field, and the finish was only a few hundred good old English yards away. I sprinted, I fell across the line, someone picked me up and wrapped a wool blanket around me. They said I’d come in second in my wave.

MY FATHER’S RACE finished on March 3. Though his sickness had lasted barely six months, half the impossibly short “long-term average survival” the doctors had given us at the start, he had endured. He’d kept going.

I had spent a year thinking about endurance. Trying to understand it as a function of physiology, of lactic acid and capillary networks. Trying to understand it as the ability to fight through the drama of pain. But now I understood it, too, as a kind of elegance, a lightness that could come only from such deep comfort with yourself that you began to forget about yourself. Something no heart monitor would ever measure.

Dad died in time to let me go to Norway for the Birkebeiner. Once I’d thought that this would be the epic end of my saga, but now I knew that whatever epiphanies I’d been allotted had come at the edge of his sickbed. Now there was just the pleasure of enduring in a great crowd of others doing the same—old men, some of them 80 and 85, a little stiff in their Lycra, but still elegant. They’d been skiing these hills 50 years ago, tracking down Allied airdrops in the woods, and they did so still, for the sheer joy of it.

The course was brutal as advertised, and I was in no danger of letting loose another epic performance. But never mind. I went deep inside, kept track of my weakening calves and my tightening chest, measured my resources against the distance left to go. And it all came out just fine—a little over four hours of hard skiing, ending with a series of sharp downhills into the Olympic stadium filled with brass bands and cheering crowds. I finished just above the middle of my age group, which I declared a great victory, considering they were all Norwegians. But I took my conquest as quietly as everyone else—there was no whooping or hollering on the bus to the showers, just satisfied and tired smiles. The year was over, and it was time for a smoked salmon pizza and a bottle of Ringnes and some Tiger Balm to rub on my aching thighs.

The next morning dawned clear and cold, and Sue and Sophie and I went for another ski. And for the first time in along time, it meant nothing at all.

Longtime contributor Bill McKibben is the author of Hope, Human and Wild, among other books. This article is adapted from his forthcoming book Long Distance: A Year of Living Strenuously, which will be published next month by Simon & Schuster.

The post Across the Disappearing Finishing Line appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Custom-Fit Camping /adventure-travel/destinations/whats-your-pleasure/ Sat, 01 Apr 2000 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/whats-your-pleasure/ Sometimes you feel like Thoreau. Sometimes you don't. Sometimes you go gourmet. Sometimes you eat gorp. Whichever way you tend, be it spartan of luxe, long-haul or short, we've done your scouting for you. From crucial gear to epic routes to prime backcountry real estate, here's your clearly marked trail to happy camping.

The post Custom-Fit Camping appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
What’s Your Pleasure?

Do you like it rough? Easy? Hard? Soft? However you choose to hit the trail, you’ll find a soul mate among the woodsy habitués who dispense their wisdom in the following pages—from the long-distance trekker and the devotee of amphibious excursions to the headstrong guy who enjoys getting lost and the gung-ho guru of fast-packing. Not to mention the backcountry hedonist with the luxury jones. So pick your style, bushwhacker—and let’s get it on.

Go Long, Go Deep
The Floating World
Get Real Gone
Wherever You Go, There You Are
Are We Not Men?
It Ain’t Heavy, It’s My Salmon on Toast Points

Go Long, Go Deep

If the point is to get away from it all, then all you need is time and distance

You check your e-mail, what, three times a day? eight times a day? the world is too much with you, friend. You need out. Not for a day. Out for ten days. By yourself, if possible. Because believe it or not, your brain can actually stop buzzing. For a day or two it will keep firing on all cylinders— what stock you should buy, what your savviest career move should be, what trip you should take next. And then for another day or two you might panic. What am I missing? Is the NASDAQ, like, plummeting?

But soon enough your brain starts to run out of gas—opinions, ideas, plans start to float away. Maybe once upon a time life was so simple that this process only took a few hours: wander in fields, write sonnet, come home, take bath. But now a day trip does more for your muscles than your mind. It’s hard to leave it all behind when it all is used to tagging along with you wherever you go.

When you do really get away, though, strangeness can happen. I remember hiking for a week by myself, easy trail- walking in the Adirondacks where I live. One rainy morning, I woke up, my mind still, didn’t bother to get dressed, and just began to wander down the trail. It was as if I gave off no vibrations at all. An owl stayed perched on a branch as I walked two feet beneath him; a deer stayed on the trail, shifting her weight to let me pass; a mother merganser paraded her young inches from where I lay naked on a rock. Late in the day I saw people coming my way—a party of four, perfectly pleasant-looking backpackers chattering their way down the trail. I’d already yanked my clothes on, but I crouched behind a fallen hemlock and hid till they were gone; I didn’t want the spell to break.

Take as much food as you can carry, but no cell phone. And no book that isn’t illustrated with pictures of the local birds or wildflowers. You can chew information all the rest of your days—the idea here is to get a little bored. Does that prospect unnerve you? It shouldn’t; it’s not like going on an airplane without a book. There’s plenty of stuff out there to read, written in what John Muir called “the great alphabet of nature.” But you have to slow down enough to see it.

One trick is to bushwhack whenever possible (and ethical). You can keep your eyes fixed as firmly on a muddy trail as you can on a four-lane highway, and if you do, your mind will drift just as quickly. When you’re off the trail, finding your way, you’re always looking. The contours of the land, the game trails, the drainages—they catch your attention, fill your head.

Sometimes, if everything’s going well, even movement starts to seem unnecessary. I remember a week I spent on the top of a mountain near my home, when I hiked no more than two or three miles from camp on any given day. I’d just head out along some ridge until I found a patch of sunshine and then sit down, or until I found a patch of berries and then fill my baseball cap. Here are the things I noticed: Night takes a long time to fall—hours, from the sun low in the sky through the pink glow to the darkening blue to the first star. Also, a mountaintop has a sufficient number of rocks and trees, needing neither more nor less to be complete. One day I lay on my stomach on a little promontory and watched a black bear pick berries on the same slope I’d browsed the day before. He moved at about the same leisurely and unconcerned pace. Like me, he had the luxury of a predatorless existence, at least until hunting season. His only work was to fill himself with calories before winter; mine was to fill myself with silence before I returned home.

If you’re lucky, nothing dramatic will happen. The days will fade into one another. That way, you’ll know it wasn’t fording the raging river, or facing down the grizzly, or surviving the thunderstorm that left you a little changed. It was just the quiet, the chance to use senses other than the info-eye or the info-ear. Which leads, of course, to the main danger of going long and deep. You might not be able to find your way back to quite the spot where you began.

GEAR—CRUCIAL FETISH
I’m a sucker for vistas—I’ll stare off into the mountains forever, memorizing the curves and thrusts of the surrounding ranges. So while Lewis and Clark carried a magnifying glass to impress the Indians with their magic fire-starting ability, I pack one in an effort to force my head down toward the ground. All you need is a Swift Instruments Pocket Magnifier ($5; 800-446-1116), or even just a little plastic lens, and you can examine the veiny wings of that annoying mosquito, the melting ice crystals on the edge of a late-spring snowfield, or the rings in a slice of pine. You can, in other words, see vast vistas even on cloudy days. —B.²Ñ.

AND TO REALLY DO IT RIGHT:
A one-foot by two-foot swatch of closed-cell foam for a sit-pad
Mountain Safety Research Heat Exchanger ($30; 800-877-9677)
Small shaker of cumin (about $3 at any grocery)
National Audubon Society Field Guide to North American Wildflowers
($19; Alfred A. Knopf)

MCKIBBEN’S DREAMLAND
Adirondack State Park, New York: Head into the hilly Silver Lake Wilderness and then hit the Northville-Placid Trail—a 133-mile trek through the rugged High Peaks region.Contact: New York State Bureau of Public Lands, 518-457-7433.

MORE PARADISE FOUND
The Wonderland Trail, Mount Rainier National Park, Washington: This 93-mile circumnavigation of the mountain traverses lowland forests and subalpine meadows. Contact: Mount Rainier National Park, 360-569-2211.

Great Smoky Mountains National Park, North Carolina and Tennessee: Over 850 miles of trails, including a stretch of the Appalachian Trail that winds around old-growth tulip poplars and under a natural arch. Contact: Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 423-436-1200.

The Long Trail, Green Mountain National Forest, Vermont: A 270-mile gallivant through farmland and into the crags. Plan for at least three weeks. Contact: Green Mountain National Forest, 802-747-6700.

Haleakala National Park, Maui: Hump through 19,000 acres of rainforest, near-desert, and the dormant Haleakala Crater in this International Biosphere Reserve. Three back-country cabins are available by advance lottery. Contact: Haleakala National Park, 808-572-4400.

PHILOSOPHY OF CAMPING 101: “People too often hike to a beautiful natural area, pitch their tent, crawl inside, zip the door, and shut out the world. This is camping? I prefer what I like to call ‘stealth camping’—wander a mile or two beyond the crowded campground, establish a low-profile campsite, and sleep under a tarp. If a deer wanders past, you see it. You stay connected to nature.”
—RAY JARDINE, AUTHOR OF BEYOND BACKPACKING

Bill McKibben’s book on cross-country ski racing, Long Distance: Notes on a Year of Living Strenuously, is due out this fall from Simon & Schuster.

The Floating World

The importance of portaging lingerie and sharing the load

I was six years old when my father and his best friend carl decided that five of their collective nine kids were old enough to discover the allure of God’s country. So, one sticky summer day in July 1976, we stuffed our watertight bags with everything we would need (firecrackers included) for a week in the Boundary Waters, where the dads planned to chisel us into mini-voyageurs. I was an easy convert: Our first morning on the water, I woke up at dawn, padded barefoot out of my tent, stuck a fat leech on the end of my Lindy Rig, and plunked down on a granite ledge that dropped off to a near-bottomless fishing hole, soaking up the sun like a beached walrus.

An hour later, my peaceful reverie was shattered when Carl stretched his 6-foot-3 frame out of the tent and broke into booming fits of laughter, waking the entire camp. “Why, Stephanie,” he bellowed, “is that a nightgown you’re wearing?” As a matter of fact, it was—my favorite full-length, flowered flannel nightie. The other kids could tease me till I cried, but as far as I was concerned, frilly sleeping apparel was fair game on a canoe trip.

Actually, even the kitchen sink is fair game if it fits in the boat and can be schlepped across a portage. I’ve seen folks lug sirloin-packed coolers and Samsonite-size tackle boxes through the wilderness. But no longer needing my security nightgown, I now stuff my Duluth Pack with only the bare necessities: an extra pair of shoes, two pair of wool socks, a stocking cap, a Hacky Sack, polypropylene long underwear, two T-shirts, a paperback novel, a pair of nylon shorts, a swimsuit, Carhartt work pants, rain gear, a sleeping bag, a headlamp, a first-aid kit, a bee-sting allergy kit, a Bible, and at least one roll of toilet paper.

But to reduce the joys of canoe-camping to the material goods you can stash between the gunwales is to discount the mesmerizing rhythm of a paddle dipping into glassy waters, the shivery call of a loon as it surfaces across the lake, and the glorious self-sufficiency of catching and eating your own walleye. Even the most terrifying episodes bring about a certain thank-God-I-didn’t-kick-the-bucket kind of happiness, like the time in the middle of Lake Agnes when every curly hair on my head stood on end, rising in staticky salute to an incoming thunderstorm.

What really elevates canoe-camping and other forms of amphibious exploration (kayak touring is no less wondrous) to the higher echelons of wilderness experience is this: It takes a partner to help muscle the craft and carry the load. I’ve guided canoe trips in Minnesota and Ontario, and my paddling partners have included Beastie, a frazzle-haired Outward Bound junkie who combed his beard with a dinner fork; Kelayna, a sassy 12-year-old who couldn’t swim a stroke but could bake a Dutch-oven chocolate cake to rival Betty Crocker’s; and Maren, a 95-pound wisp who I once saw portage a canoefor eight miles. No matter what our differences were in the real world, we still managed to create our own peaceable kingdom, a self-propelling yin to each other’s yang.

On some days, however, when the weather turns hypothermic or super-size mosquitoes zoom in for the kill, the dark side of even the most symbiotic paddling partnership can reveal itself. Such was the case when Kelayna the cake-baker decided she was homesick, tired, and dying of malaria. Her proposal: to tough it out alone at the campsite while I paddled the four days, 16 lakes, and 15 portages to call for a rescue party at the nearest phone. With bodily force and strategic cajoling—namely, the false promise of a 7-Eleven Big Gulp just a few portages away—I managed to coax her back into the boat.

Chances are you won’t be held captive with strangers on your next paddling venture, but even relationships with siblings, spouses, parents, and friends take on a new light after a few days on the water. You discover, for example, that your brother, once a head-banger, now has an affinity for Yo-Yo Ma. Or that your mother once was a Girl Scout archery champion. Or that your husband can spend hours on end picking blueberries. Such insights are often as fleeting as wispy clouds, disappearing the moment you strap the boat on the roof rack and head back to civilization. The memories that linger, though, are of the soul-searching debates—and jokes—over the Big Questions, like, does God really exist? Or, more important, who lit the firecracker under Dad’s sleeping pad back in ’76?

It wasn’t me. I was out fishing in my flannel nightie.

GEAR—CRUCIAL FETISH
I wouldn’t think twice about lending my kevlar wenonah canoe to a friend in need, but I pity the fool who asks to borrow my paddle. My prized Moore Grand Classic Cue ($400, 843-681-5986) is a sophisticated, lightweight carbon-fiber paddle that propels even the most sluggish, gear-laden aluminum barge through the water like a sleek barracuda, without a hint of yaw or wobble. Grasp its uncompromisingly stiff, hollow shaft, grip the well-sculpted butt, execute an effortless J-stroke, and you’ll never regret the dotcom stock you had to hawk for a week in the wilderness with the coveted, if costly, Cue. Best of all, at a feathery 18 ounces, it makes long-distance portages a joy. Almost. â€ÖÀ.³Ò.

AND TO REALLY DO IT RIGHT:
Duluth Pack ($42-$185; 800-777-4439)
Clarins SPF 30 Suncare Cream ($21.50 for 4.4 ounces; 212-980-1800)
Lindy Rig ($1.89 for hook, line, and sinker; 218-829-1714)
Coleman five-gallon expandable water carrier ($6.60; 800-835-3278)

GREGORY’S DREAMLAND
Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness: More than 1,000 clean, rocky lakes laced with 1,500 miles of canoe routes in northern Minnesota’s moose country. Blueberry patches abound. Call BWCA for reservations, 877-550-6777.

MORE PARADISE FOUND
The Na Pali Coast, Kauai, Hawaii: Dodge towering waterfalls, laze on secluded beaches, and watch sea turtles cavort along this stunning coastline—but only in summer, when the surf is down. Contact: Hawaii State Parks, 808-274-3444.

Okefenokee National Wildlife Refuge, Georgia: Swamp heaven, with 396,000 acres of peat bog, alligator habitat, and moss-shrouded creeks along the Florida border. Contact: Okefenokee Visitor Center, 912-496-7836.

Buffalo National River, Arkansas: Deliverance jokes aside, the Buffalo is epic fun. It’s lined with limestone bluffs and shady hollows, and flows through three designated wilderness areas. Contact: Buffalo National River, 870-741-5443.

Bowron Lake Provincial Park, British Columbia: A spectacular 72-mile-long chain of lakes, rivers, and trails on the western slopes of the Cariboo Mountains. Reservations required. Contact: Tourism British Columbia, 800-663-6000.

“Outdoor Research makes women’s clothing with a pee system and the zipper opens wide enough so that you can do more than that. Title Nine Sports makes a zip-open bra, for easy access. A Lush oil-filled massage bar for him. And get a tent that gives you a better morning glow than green. You don’t want your partner to wake up and think they just slept with the Loch Ness monster.”
—LUANN COLOMBO, AUTHOR OF HOW TO HAVE SEX IN THE WOODS

Stephanie Gregory writes The Wild File for ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø.

Get Real Gone

Being lost may be the truest course to finding your way

I get my TV news from Denver. Some of the anchors are less androidlike than others, but they all recite the same headlines. A recurring topic: an ill-prepared adventurer vanishing in the Colorado wilderness. The man was last seen wearing only cut-off jeans and a T-shirt. Authorities fear he might not have survived freezing temperatures and a mountain storm that dropped hail the size of Anjou pears.

My first reaction is to envy the exciting perils of these men in T-shirts. Then I read something in the furrowed brows of the TV anchors: the chilling truth that newsworthy outdoorsfolk rarely make it back to check their Nielsens.

OK, you can die out there. Usually, though, misplacing yourself is neither so public nor so tragic. I, for one, get lost on a regular basis. Yet I always manage to find my way out before friends and family can agree which of my organs to donate and which to keep for themselves. Being prepared for getting lost is a skill like any other. The trick is to keep a cool head. The rational mind knows that fat reserves can keep you alive in the wild for weeks. Even better, the rational mind can think your butt back to safety.

The most obvious strategy is to turn back the way you came. My brother tells a story of being lost with his wife in Southern California’s Los Padres National Forest. Relying on an outdated guidebook, they set off on a Saturday morning to spend the weekend hiking a long loop—not knowing that the Forest Service stopped maintaining the trail in the late eighties. They struggled for a day and a half through a maddening overgrowth of chaparral, manzanita, and poison oak before totally losing the trail in a place jovially known as the Devil’s Potrero, or “pasture.” They turned back late Sunday, but not in time to avoid an unplanned night in the woods. On Monday, when my sister-in-law didn’t show up for work, concerned coworkers asked the Highway Patrol to check accident records for any sign of the missing couple. Their humiliating retreat didn’t end until late that night, when they hitched a ride with a random band of beekeepers dressed, as my brother said, “all in white, like angels.”

How painful is it to retrace your path when you planned a loop? Well, five years after this misadventure, my brother still rants at length about Forest Service budget cuts and their effect on trail maintenance. He forgets to mention that, while they were lost in the Los Padres, he and his wife conceived their first child.

For most of us, getting lost is little more than an inconvenience. The 21st century, however, has declared a holy war on inconvenience. With cell phones and GPS receivers, we can keep ourselves present and accounted for at all times. What a bunch of weenies we are. If you do get lost, take the opportunity to tap into the better human qualities, i.e. our powers of deduction and animalistic instinct for self-preservation. Bring water, food, and an extra layer of clothes. Don’t just look for landmarks and terrain features, take their measure, too. If a pretty, snowy mountain slope is tilted steeply and bereft of trees, it’s an avalanche zone. Hiking amongst big, dead trees on a windy day is wilderness Jenga. So think, dammit, think.

A few years ago I took a solo tour of the Tatoosh Range in Rainier National Park. I ambled aimlessly, and tangled myself in thick underbrush on the wrong side of a ridge. The skies wept and my fingers grew numb. It seemed I had two choices: to brainstorm my way out or to fashion a nice deathbed pillow from D.B. Cooper’s wormy skull. I figured that parallel valleys all drained to the same place, so I tramped downstream along a creek until it emptied into a river adjacent to an unfamiliar trail. My sense of direction urged me to go right, and eventually I made a grotesque circle back to my original trailhead.

If you have the good sense to get lost in the daytime, use the sun. Even overcast skies glow a little brighter in one direction. Consider it east or west, depending on the time of day. Factor in the time of year, also—that brighter shade of pale in the sky will trend southward around the winter solstice and northward in June and July. The sun is the only star I trust. Some say you can navigate by the south-pointing triangle of Deneb, Vega, and Altair, but it’s hard enough to find one star, let alone three.

The way I see it, getting lost provides unexpected relief from the sometimes tedious “eat-recreate-eat-sleep” routine of a camping trip. Veer off-trail and you might stumble upon a bulbous porcini, a 500-year-old Incan mummy, or the Treasure of the Sierra Madre. You camp in order to reconnect with the wild, right? So go ahead and ramble. Remember, the beaten path, by its very nature, is beat.

GEAR—CRUCIAL FETISH
Ineptitude has an antidote, and its name is education. But education can be a colossal bore. So I prefer an antidote that’s cozy and puffy and never lectures me: a Kelty Pulsar down sleeping bag ($190; 800-423-2320). Rated to 15 degrees, the three-pound Pulsar is a three-season bag, which means it takes up significantly less room than a bin of caramel corn. More like a dachshund. No, young campers, there’s no substitute for brains. But when you’re stumbling through a forest at midnight, you can roll out a Pulsar on a random patch of ground and act like you meant to sleep there all along. Which is way more comforting than knowing where the hell you are. ‸é.³§.

AND TO REALLY DO IT RIGHT:
Porter Products Big Sky Bistro Coffee Press ($16; 888-327-9908)
Leatherman PST multi-purpose tool ($57; 800-847-8665)
PUR Explorer Water Purifier ($130; 800-787-5463)
The North Face Packable Pant ($78; 800-362-4963)

STORY’S DREAMLAND
Weminuche Wilderness, Colorado: The region’s 470 miles of hikeable routes include an 80-mile leg of the Continental Divide Trail, plus three fourteeners you can climb in the summer and backcountry ski in the spring. Contact: Rio Grande National Forest, 719-852-5941.

MORE PARADISE FOUND
Zion National Park, Utah: Dis-appear for days into remote slot canyons where ferns cling to 300-foot-high sandstone walls. Contact: Zion National Park, 435-772-3256.

San Bernardino National Forest, California: Massive granite escarpments, crenulated peaks, and 538 miles of trails. The smog of Los Angeles, 60 miles to the southwest, makes for impressive Technicolor sunsets. Contact: San Bernardino National Forest, 909-383-5588.

Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, Nevada and California: The largest forest in the Lower 48, with 22 mountain ranges and 72 peaks over 10,000 feet. Prepare for solitude. Contact: Humboldt-Toiyabe National Forest, 775-331-6444.

Ozark Trail, Missouri: A shady 307 miles of trails. Cool off and get all transcendental in countless limestone caverns along the way. Contact: Mark Twain National Forest, 573-364-4621.

“Your circadian rhythm becomes skewed, personal hygiene is a challenge, and after a week anybody will start to miss the sun and wide open spaces.”
—PAT KAMBESIS, CAVE PHOTOGRAPHER, CODISCOVERER OF THE CHANDELIER BALLROOM IN NEW MEXICO’S LECHUGUILLA CAVE

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø correspondent Rob Story profiled the ski-filmmeisters of Teton Gravity Research in the November 1999 issue.

Wherever You Go, There You Are

A guide to GPS and the technical frontier of navigation

Bob Graham is a man possessed. Still blonde, wiry, and boyish at 58, this retired Courtland, California, farmer-turned-mountaineer has spent the past five years roaming the Sierra Nevada in an attempt to retrace the 122-mile-long route taken by John C. Frémont in 1844, when the brave but vainglorious lieutenant, along with Kit Carson and a detail from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, made the first known winter crossing of the northern half of the range. In his own travels, Graham has seen his car battery explode due to high altitude and been menaced by a mountain lion. But he’s never lost sight of his key obsession: How did a half-frozen, wandering adventurer like Frémont find his way through a forbidding alpine maze?

One snowy morning last spring, Graham let me tag along on a hike to one of the explorer’s campsites, a spot near Carson Pass he’d recently discovered. As walks in the woods go, it was both geographically and intellectually rigorous, with Graham delivering a lecture on the technological advances that have eased the burdens of land navigation. To emphasize his point, he explained that Frémont’s duties as leader of a U.S. government–sponsored survey expedition included having to call a halt at midday and get up at odd hours of the night, weather permitting, to futz with a bunch of sextants, chronometers, thermometers, telescopes, astronomical tables, and complex mathematical formulae, and thus determine the latitude, longitude, and altitude of his exploring party.

Fast-forward a century and a half. As we snowshoed up a spur ridge covered in aspens and lodgepole pines, Graham suddenly stopped, reached into his parka pocket, and extracted his cell phone–size Magellan 315 Global Positioning System receiver.

“What if Frémont had had this?” he barked. Well, maybe his men wouldn’t have had to eat their boots. Alas, this was not the answer Graham was looking for.

“He wouldn’t have had to get up in the middle of the night, waiting to fix one of the Jovan moons,” he said. “At any moment of the day or night he would’ve known where he was.”

Then he punched a button. In seconds, our position materialized on the tiny screen: Latitude 38Å¡ 41′ 56″ N; Longitude 119Å¡ 57′ 35″ W; Altitude 7,776 feet. So much for Jovan moons.

IT KNOWS WHERE YOU LIVE

The GPS relies on a constellation of 24 orbiting satellites that the United States Department of Defense began launching in 1978 to meet its own navigational needs, and to keep tabs on military movements during the Cold War. Using atomic clocks accurate to within one second every 70,000 years, each satellite continuously broadcasts the time and its position. A GPS receiver, pulling in signals from three or more satellites simultaneously, then measures how long it takes them to arrive, calculates the distance to each orbiting body, and, using simple geometry, produces a fix on your position.

First made available to the public in the 1980s, GPS technology nowadays is exploited by everybody from bush pilots to mountaineers to your Uncle Milt the bass fisherman. Instead of having to lug around a load of obscure, weighty, and hard-to-figure-out navigational equipment (would you know where to buy a sextant these days?), now you can push a button or two on your GPS receiver and, just like that, you’re on the map. Most models can store at least 200 “waypoints,” readings on locations you either want to go to or have been to already. If you haven’t been there, keystroke the coordinates and your GPS will help you find the spot; if you’re already there, just press a button to bookmark the position. By entering a series of waypoints, you can create a route and store the whole thing for later use.

In his hunt for Frémont’s trail, Graham typically studies a topographical map to suss out the coordinates of a particular Sierra locale he wants to visit, and then keys them in to his GPS. Using the same map, he finds a road that takes him within striking distance, parks, and switches on his GPS to take a reading on his location. At this point the instrument can tell him exactly how far his target is and in what direction. Now it’s just a matter of using a compass to hike to the site. That’s right—a compass. As the amateur cartographer is quick to point out, while GPS would have greatly reduced Frémont’s logistical burdens, it would not have solved the mess he got himself into. “Since Frémont didn’t have a decent map of the Sierra to use GPS by, the system would have told him where he was, but not where he had to go—or anything about terrain,” Graham says. “The Sierra still would have been terra incognita for him.”

JUST DON’T FORGET THE MAP

When it comes to terra incognita, Graham knows what he’s talking about. Because merely pinpointing your position won’t get you anywhere, you need to own traditional orienteering skills along with that fancy GPS. To fully exploit the data it provides, you should know how to use a topographical map, a compass, and a plotting scale—a rulerlike tool calibrated to the same scale and coordinate system as your map.

And then there’s the small matter of UTM. All GPS receivers provide traditional latitude-longitude readings but, increasingly, many also utilize the newer Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) coordinate system. Universal Transverse whaaaa, you ask? Good question. Lines of longitude and latitude superimposed on the earth’s spherical surface result in inconstant distance factors, meaning a degree of longitude at the equator is about 69 miles long, whereas it’s about 49 miles long at Minneapolis, on the 45th parallel. By “flattening” the earth’s nonpolar regions into a rectangle and dividing them into 60 zones, UTM reduces those inconsistencies.

Both systems work, it’s just a matter of personal preference. In Graham’s case, he sticks with traditional latitude-longitude readings. “Most of the time, I’m working with 19th-century maps and Frémont’s journals, which don’t use UTM,” he says. For the rest of you modern-day frontiersmen out there, now may be the time to get acquainted with both systems, lest you find yourself using your shiny new GPS device as a projectile to fend off vultures.

If most of this sounds like a techno-geek soliloquy left out of the latest Star Trek flick, here are a couple of pre-Computer Age caveats. First, although GPS receivers feature tiny video screens that display preprogrammed map grids with various zoom options, those images don’t compare in detail and scope with traditional paper topo maps—so definitely use both. Second, while GPS offers bankable latitude and longitude coordinates, its altitude readings are often unreliable (see “Going Up?”, a review of altimeters, page 130).

Ultimately, Graham is pretty sure he would have found the Frémont campsite using the old maps-and-legends method, but GPS made success a speedy certainty. “Without GPS,” he says, “even after getting close to the site, it would have been hours of wandering here and there.” Which is fine if you’re basking in nature’s splendors, but not so good if your men are starting to gaze longingly at your footwear.


REMOTE CONTROLS

Garmin GPS 12MAP
Kitted out with a welded, waterproof case, the Garmin 12MAP ($425; 913-397-8200) allows you to download topographic information from a separate MapSource CD-ROM ($152), so you’ll know when your trail will rise to meet you.

Lowrance GlobalMap 100
The GlobalMap 100‘s ($199; 800-324-1356) high-contrast screen is easy to read in daylight, so the map details downloaded from the accessory CD-ROM ($129) come out clearer than your path through the woods.

Magellan GPS 300
Small and lightweight, the rubber-encased Magellan 300 ($100; 909-394-5000) is suited for the space-challenged backpacker, and its intuitive operating system and low price make it attractive to weekend campers, too. —JOHN BRANIGIN

Tom Chaffin teaches U.S. history at Emory University and is currently working on a biography of John C. Frémont.

Are We Not Men?

Give it up, cut it out, travel light—because nobody wants to be a pack mule

We roared into the parking lot at dusk, loaded our packs in the dark, donned headlamps, and set off up the trail. We hiked for three hours, made camp under a shotgun blast of stars, and didn’t get up until the morning sun turned the tent into a sauna.

We’d been in such a hurry to get off work, get out of town and get into the mountains that it was only when we finally decided to whip up some breakfast that we discovered things were missing. I’d apparently left my stuff sack of extra clothes in the car—gone were my long pants, fleece vest, extra socks, and my baseball cap. Mike dumped his pack and did inventory. Somehow he had forgotten his cup, the extra bottles of stove fuel, his windpants, and worst of all, one of the food bags.

“Guess we’ll just go without,” said Mike, grinning goofily.

And we did, hiking the Medicine Bow Range from Elk Mountain in Wyoming to the Rawahs in Colorado. I wore what little I had, put on my windbreaker when it got cold, and wrapped my sleeping bag around my shoulders in the evening. We saved fuel and rationed the food; Mike used the pot as his cup. None of this caused hardship. On the contrary, our packs were lighter and thus so were our hearts.

On the next trip, loading up in the parking lot, Mike grabbed my sack of spare clothes and threw it back into the car. “Cut it!”

“Then you gotta cut everything you forgot last time.”

“Already did,” he said.

Not to be outdone, I pulled the stove bag out of his pack and tossed it back into the car.

“Excellent, man, excellent,” crooned Mike.

We did that trip eating breakfast and lunch cold and building the tiniest of campfires to cook dinner. It was a spartan trek. Unburdened by dead weight, we moved quickly and smoothly through the mountains, covering more country more easily than we had ever done before.

Mike and I decided to call our game “the big cut.” Pushing further, we added variations. On any adventure, before leaving the parking lot (or the airport), each of us was empowered to remove one item from the other guy’s pack. Our trips became ultralean and efficient. For every pound of gear we cut from our packs we were rewarded with an extra mile on the trail. More for less. More of the wilderness in exchange for less equipment. Instead of sweating underneath monstrous loads, moving as slowly and ponderously as beasts of burden, we cruised the trail like coyotes, heads up, alert, eyes on the horizon.

Here’s the real trick to traveling light: Scrutinize every piece of gear. Why take a three-pound, multi-zippered, multi-pocketed, expedition jacket when an eight-ounce windbreaker is sufficient? Why take a heavy full-length air mattress when, with the right campsite selection, an eight-ounce foam pad is enough? Why carry a ten-pound tent “tested on Everest” when, if the point is to be outside, a four-pound tent is terrific? Why take a bulky sweater when a featherweight down vest is adequate? Why carry extra food when you’ll never eat it? Why carry extra water when you can move from stream to stream and purify what you need? And now that you’re carrying half the weight, why use a seven-pound backpack when a three-pound pack is fine?

Why? Because it goes against everything we’ve learned to crave. Ours is a maximalist culture—the bigger the better. Minimalism is discouraged, even denigrated—but take a minute and think about the last time you were on the trail. A fat, plush Cadillac may be fine for the highway, a big-screen TV just the thing for home theater thrills, but carrying a heavy backpack is backbreaking work. It crushes the body, flattens the spirit, and makes about as much sense as carrying a picnic table when you would be just as happy sitting on the grass.

In the end, the decision to go light and fast is an existential one. To enter the wilderness is to dispossess ourselves of the burden of possessions, to slip smooth and clean as Houdini from the thousand invisible chains of stuff. Once inside, we become, however briefly, part of the wild—lithe, lighthearted and free, loping across the landscape.

So next time you’re getting ready to head out, identify every single thing you doubt you’ll really need. Then forget it.

GEAR—CRUCIAL FETISH
The topographic map is the essential tool for moving swiftly and efficiently through the backcountry. But that’s only the beginning, because a waterproof topo map—especially one from Earthwalk Press Maps ($8; 800-742-2677)—is actually a two-dimensional book of natural history. The wriggling brown ink of its contour lines will tell you if the pass will be high and choked with snow or low and dry, where the elk will be in summer (high and in the shade on steep forested slopes), and where the buffalo will be in winter (near the hot pools where the grass is still green). A topo map is as deep as a lake. The surface will show you where, but it’s the depths that whisper why. â€Äâ.´³.

AND TO REALLY DO IT RIGHT:
Trojan-Enz 12-pack ($4). Beyond its primary use, a nonlubricated prophylactic will hold one liter of water.
Polar Pure iodine-crystal water treatment kit ($10; 408-867-4576)
Outdoor Research Windstopper Alpine Hat ($22; 206-467-8197)
Butler GUM unwaxed dental floss ($.99). It’s the best sewing thread going.

JENKIN’S DREAMLAND
Kootenay National Park, British Columbia: Well-maintained trails in this mountain Valhalla include the Rockwall, which works its way along a 2,300-foot-high limestone escarpment. Contact: Kootenay National Park, 250-347-9615.

MORE PARADISE FOUND
10th Mountain Division Hut Association, Aspen, Colorado: Hop from one alpine hut to another on 300 miles of skiable (in winter) and bikeable (in summer) trails in the White River National Forest. Reservations required.Contact: 10th Mountain Division Hut Assn., 970-925-5775.

Mount Katahdin, Baxter State Park, Maine: Katahdin, the top end of the Appalachian Trail, rises 5,267 feet above 202,064 acres of wilderness. Watch out for blackflies, and hikers spouting Thoreau. Contact: Baxter State Park, 207-723-5140.

Yosemite National Park, California: Leave the Tuolumne Meadows behind and hike north into spectacular Sierra wilderness, where the pine cones are a foot long.Contact: Yosemite National Park, 209-372-0200.

Henry Mountains, Utah: Take the rough Back Country Byway 20 miles south of Hanksville up to Bull Creek Pass. Keep an eye peeled for the occasional wild bison herd, then head up to Mount Ellen to explore the abandoned gold mines.Contact: BLM, Hanksville, 435-542-3461.

“The more our camping style depends on the paraphernalia of the world we are leaving behind, the more we dwell in contradictions.”
—IAN BAKER, BUDDHIST SCHOLAR AND EXPEDITION LEADER

“It’s really seductive to take along complicated-looking gear, but when it comes down to it, I think you’re better off without that battery-operated egg beater.

—DEBORAH SUSSEX, NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL INSTRUCTOR AND PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Mark Jenkins is The Hard Way columnist for ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø.

It Ain’t Heavy, It’s My Salmon on Toast Points

Sometimes luxury is a necessity

Carole Latimer is prepping for the wilderness at a trailhead in the southern Sierra Nevada. Before her sits an organizational challenge commensurate with her stature as a cuisiniere en plein air and the Martha Stewart of gracious camping. She’s putting together food, fuel, and cooking gear for a six-day, six-person backpacking trip that will top out on the 14,494-foot summit of Mount Whitney, and right now her staging area looks like an Outward Bound plane crash—dinged and scorched cookware, Nalgene bottles, Ziplocs within Ziplocs. The matériel commingles with a foods-of-the-world Pile of Babel, from poblano peppers to wasabi paste. For three hours, Latimer walks and crawls around the wreckage, organizing ingredients for breakfasts, multi-course dinners, and snacks. All told, she has about 70 pounds of dunnage that she and her group must divvy up and add to their packs. In skinny air on steep trails, every little superfluity will hurt. On the other hand, a missed must-have could kill: Leave behind the nori or the sticky rice and you can forget about sushi night.

Latimer works with peevish focus, but then suddenly she’s ready, shouldering an enormous external frame pack. A smile slices her cheeky apricot-colored face and she dances onto the trail. “I love it!” she yells. “God, I love it!” What she loves, among other things, is weight on her back. “I’m the reincarnation of a mule,” she says.

She also adores leading pilgrims into the Sierras with a load of grande luxe comestibles. Latimer occupies a singular position in the outdoors: For 22 years she has pushed back the limits of backcountry deliciousness through her Berkeley-based guiding company , which specializes in all-women trips. But she doesn’t mind taking me and another Y-chromosomer on this outing, a recapitulation of her standard Whitney hike. We’re taking a roundabout, scenery-maximized backside approach to the top of the mountain. We’ll cover about 42 miles, with one goof-around day at a particularly gorgeous campsite. Whitney’s role, as Latimer explains it, is to provide incentive as well as aesthetics. “I think it’s good to have a goal,” she says. But the goal’s goal is sybaritic delight. And I’m getting hungry.

OK, I am un-wowed by the thai tom yum soup on our first night in the backcountry. The problem is not the soup but psychic displacement. I don’t know where I am yet and compare Latimer’s tom yum to restaurant fare. But then, after a few day’s hiking, Latimer flips me and everybody else to the 33rd level of gustatory bliss with her salmon on toast points.

It doesn’t hurt that the campsite is as good as the hors d’oeuvres. We’re in a 9,600-foot valley in a copse of pines between a trout stream and a glistening meadow. The group stands around the maestra, who kneels in pine duff, browning slices of bread in a banged-up frying pan over an itty-bitty camp stove. She cuts the toast into dainty triangles, smears on the salmon and offers them around. The first bite is oral Fantasia. The smoked fish swims to heaven while Holsteins sing the cream-cheese chorus and herbs and minced green onion go off like fireworks. The toast—pain grille, really—makes the whole business too too. The contradiction between here-and-now and what we’re eating opens a toothsome rent in reality. Latimer seems to be having even more fun than we are. “I like the element of surprise, of turning people on,” she says. “Cooks are egoists. They love the praise they get.”

Latimer’s ego can dine hugely on us, who praise her nonstop. Most of our meals are straight out of her 1991 book, Wilderness Cuisine, which is a woods-foodie standard. She doesn’t mind sharing unpublished recipes, which seem too simple to be such knockouts. The salmon spread, for instance, is just cream cheese stirred up with a piece of vacuum-packed fish and a bit of dill and onion. Anybody could do it, except, of course, most of us wouldn’t bother, much less follow it with a romaine salad perfectly dressed with rice-wine vinegar (Latimer tosses ours in a plastic grocery sack patched with duct tape), and then pesto over angel hair and fresh-baked brownies.

Like Alfred Hitchcock, who mapped out every camera shot on storyboards ahead of time, Latimer mentally rehearses each of her evening meals. “I have only a limited number of pots and stuff,” she says. “I start planning my dinner out in my head. Exactly, step by step, what I’m going to do.” Latimer has devised a battery of shortcuts and weight-saving gadgetry. She travels sans water filter, killing microbes with tincture of iodine (ten drops per liter of water) then killing off the medicine flavor with powdered ascorbic acid. The Latimer-signature backpackers’ cupboard/dish drainer consists of a 3 by 4-foot piece of nylon window screen folded in half and pinned to a line strung horizontally between two trees. Dishes dry quickly in it, and they’re easy to keep track of. She also carries a smaller piece of screen which multitasks as a colander, salad spinner, and scouring pad.

During our layover day, Latimer cranks the backwoods-comfort meter up to ten. She leads her group to a nearby waterfall, where she proffers chevre and sun-dried tomatoes. The high point, from her end, is finding wild watercress to garnish the plate just so. “I’m having fun now!” she enthuses. But she also finds time to loll with her back against a tree. Just sitting in the sun, Latimer fosters an illusion that follows her through the trip: Somewhere, just out of sight, she has her own secret resort hotel, because she looks too good to be camping. She sports the same synthetic fuzz and techno-cloth as the rest of us, but she wears it with more flair and a few extras—scarf, silver earrings, lipstick. Grooming, she says, is part of the disciplined attention to one’s own needs that can mean survival. “Where are you going to draw the line, if you let yourself go?” she demands. “Are you going to let yourself get cold? Is it going to be no lipstick? I mean, where’s the line?”

I can’t imagine what the guy-equivalent of lipstick might be, but I’m with her—it’s treacherous to cross the slob line. And I can’t help but notice how the survival/fashion gear flatters her. Latimer is good to sit next to; brown-eyed, with an arsenal of smiles and a low, precise voice with an accentless twang. If a puma had her own radio show, she’d sound like Latimer. Rrrrrow. At 55, she doesn’t play tricks with artificial youth. She’s just an all-American babe with crow’s-feet and decades of windburn. She’s also a fifth-generation daughter of the Sierra foothills, raised in Placerville, California, a couple of hundred miles northwest of where we sit. Childhood backpacking trips with her father taught Latimer that camping is eating. “We had biscuits and eggs and salad with Thousand Island dressing. And bacon. And trout, golden trout,” she rhapsodizes. Her food is a contemporized throwback. It’s also a protest against what she calls “Sierra Club nerds” who make camping into something anal-compulsive and meager. Ultralight fetishism particularly gets on her nerves. Says Latimer, sounding as if she’d like to biff it out with a nerd right now, “There are plenty of hard-core people who carry heavy packs.”

Latimer confides something about mount whitney: it might be the tallest peak in the Lower 48, but it’s not the apogee of our trip. “The goal is the garbage-bag bath,” she says. There’s no way to know if she’s right during the bath itself, because it happens three days before we summit. But the post-trip view bears her out. Whitney is this great big, you know, mountain. There’s nothing all that surprising up there—at least not on the scale of a packable solar-heated spa.

Latimer’s recipe:

Spread a ground cloth 300 feet from a water source where the sun can shine unobstructed for at least four hours. Set out two extra-large black garbage bags and fill with six gallons of water apiece. (Tie the bags loosely shut while filling to prevent spills.) Close the bags and leave the sun to do its work. When the bags are warm, it’s bath time. Use one bag to wash, the other to rinse.

The water in my bag is more tepid than hot, but things start to get miraculous when I sit in it, pull the plastic up to chest level, and remember backcountry baths past. Where are the goose bumps, the screaming from ice-water shock? How come I don’t want to run to the sleeping bag and go into fetal position? The bath is so not-horrible that there’s time to sink into it, to splash and look around at the meadow, the trees on the far side, the mountains over the trees. In five minutes the garbage bag is kicking the ass of every outdoor spa in the West. Here, in a sack of Sierra bathwater, is the entire Camping-with-Carole-Latimer experience: It could be miserable, except she’s figured out a way to make it more like a week at Canyon Ranch.

Speaking of which, isn’t this sushi night?   

GEAR—CRUCIAL FETISH
Without a stick of butter, a whole onion, and a clove of garlic, your camp food is mere nutrition. As the French, and Madame Latimer, say, onion marries flavors. Consider butter and garlic the best man and maid of honor. They give earthy authenticity to freeze-dried dishes, so much so you’ll forget that dinner came out of foil packets. Double-Ziploc the onion and garlic, and whittle as needed; keep the butter in a wide-mouth Nalgene jar. Don’t even consider margarine or powdered onion or garlic, they’re an insult to glorious °ù±ð²¹±ô¾±³Ùé.â€Äâ.³§.

AND TO REALLY DO IT RIGHT:
Asian noodles. Soak in hot water and you’ve got pasta.
Tang and dark rum. Mix four ounces rum to one packet of the orangy insta-drink. Commence cocktail hour.
Coleman Peak One Feather 442 Stove ($55; 800-835-3278)
Opinel Folding Knife Model OP-8 ($11; 303-462-0662)

STEERE’S DREAMLAND
North Manitou Island, Michigan: White-sand beaches and protected bird habitats encourage lollygagging on this piney isle. Contact: Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore, 231-326-5134.

MORE PARADISE FOUND
Big Bend National Park, Texas: Where the Rio Grande slices through 1,500-foot canyons, the ragged Chisos Mountains rise up sharply from the desert, and seldom is heard a discouraging word. Contact: Big Bend National Park, 915-477-2251.

Dempster Highway, Yukon and Northwest Territories: One of only three roads in North America that cross the Arctic Circle, its 451 miles of gravel are a choice jumping-off point for tundra exploration. Just watch out for hungry, omnivorous grizzlies. Contact: Tourism Yukon, 867-667-5340.

Sycamore Canyon, Arizona: Hot, rugged, peaceful, this is a miniature version of the Grand Canyon—minus the RV parade. Contact: Kaibab National Forest, 520-635-8200.

Gulf Islands, British Columbia: Tucked in a sunny pocket off soggy Vancouver Island, these wooded islets are a refuge for those seeking splendid isolation.Contact: Tourism British Columbia, 800-663-6000.

“People don’t realize how much dead space there is in a pack. You learn to stuff the pots with food and squirrel away the cheese.”
—MARK HARVEY, AUTHOR OF THE NATIONAL OUTDOOR LEADERSHIP SCHOOL WILDERNESS GUIDE

“I did start to consume a bit of Mountain Dew towards the end. Other than that, I guess I’m naturally full of energy. Fourteen hours a day was not that hard.”

—PETE PALMER, FASTEST-EVER THROUGH-HIKER ON THE APPALACHIAN TRAIL: 48 DAYS, 20 HOURS

ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø correspondent Mike Steere profiled GoLite, an ultralight camping-gear startup, in the December 1999 issue.

The post Custom-Fit Camping appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Winter? These Guys Made Winter. /outdoor-adventure/snow-sports/winter-these-guys-made-winter/ Tue, 01 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0000 /uncategorized/winter-these-guys-made-winter/ Winter? These Guys Made Winter.

As you drive into the snowy settlement of Lake Placid—past the looming twin ski jumps; past the futuristic “Miracle on Ice” hockey arena; past, even, the fivesome of holiday wreaths linked in that telltale pattern—you’ll soon understand what the locals have long known: that the business of those closing ceremonies was merely a formality. In … Continued

The post Winter? These Guys Made Winter. appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>
Winter? These Guys Made Winter.

As you drive into the snowy settlement of Lake Placid—past the looming twin ski jumps; past the futuristic “Miracle on Ice” hockey arena; past, even, the fivesome of holiday wreaths linked in that telltale pattern—you’ll soon understand what the locals have long known: that the business of those closing ceremonies was merely a formality. In this otherwise quiet corner of the northern Adirondacks, Olympic fever shows no sign of abating 18 years after Eric Heiden skated off with his fistful of golds.

Host to the Winter Games in both 1932 and 1980, Lake Placid is perhaps more closely associated with the Olympics than any place save Athens. And because the Games’ venues are open to the public, a winter visit represents not only the ultimate nostalgia trip, but also a chance to try out every winter sport ever devised. The adrenaline junkie inside you is guaranteed to emerge, driving you from the speed-skating oval to the luge run to the cross-country ski center.
But that’s not to suggest that playing Olympian is Lake Placid’s only allure. In fact, you can still find other, more tranquil faces of this small town with relative ease. Just head a few miles in any direction and you’ll enter seemingly endless, snow-muffled wilderness. Places like Avalanche Lake, hidden at the end of an inviting cross-country trail. Or the 70-year-old Adirondak Loj, built by Melvil Dewey, the unlikely progenitor of what would become America’s first winter resort.
Starting in the 1880s, Lake Placid was a posh summer spot for industrialists aspiring to the Great Adirondack Camp style of the Rockefellers and Vanderbilts. But it wasn’t until 1904 that Dewey, a rabid anti-Semite, inventor of the card catalog system, and spelling-simplification enthusiast, decided to keep his Lake Placid Club open once the snow flew. He imported ten pairs of skis, and soon the village was as crowded in winter as it was in summer.
Right from the start the emphasis was on competition. In the two decades following the 1932 Games, Lake Placid held more international events and turned out more Olympians than any other town in the nation. After a period of decline, it ramped up again for 1980, an affair that attracted more visitors in just two days—100,000—than had attended all the 1932 events combined. Since 1982, regional authorities have poured more than $40 million into venue improvements and are actively courting the next U.S. bid—perhaps in 2014.
In the meantime, those of us without national team affiliations can take our pick from between the Placids: interactive Olympic theme park or venerable backcountry retreat. Or better yet, indulge your schizophrenic recreational tendencies and enthusiastically embrace both.

The Olympic Theme Park

Lake Placid’s Main Street, which stretches about a mile along the shore of Mirror Lake (and not the larger namesake body of water that lies to the north), is an apparition of constant freneticism stranded in the frozen heart of the Adirondacks. From whichever direction you approach, the town’s emphatic contrast with the surrounding pastoral lull comes as a bit of a shock. But equally surprising is that the village still seems tiny—too tiny, in fact, to have hosted a recent Olympics.
Just at the village’s entrance, though, as New York 73 curves west into Main Street, you’ll spot the Games’ first grand-scale Kilroys: the open-air speed-skating oval and the vast Olympic Center, where the underdog American hockey team so memorably whipped the Ruskis. Out on the oval, it’s hard to resist imitating the speedsuit-clad racers, hands tucked behind their backs as they blaze past. But this act usually lasts no more than about 10 laps, after which you’ll have to take a seat to ease the burning in your quads. Inside the echoing, bunkerlike Olympic Center are a museum and four rinks, a couple of which are usually hosting a hockey tournament or curling practice. Watch a while, and then huff through a few training laps of your own.


Farther up the main drag, the road narrows. On your right is Mirror Lake, encircled by a brick sidewalk that’s a popular two-and-a-half-mile stroll on sunnier winter days and typically frozen solid and skidded across by dogsledders and skaters. Main Street’s 100 or so shops are half kitschy, half charming: the inevitable Gap and U.S. Olympic Spirit Store indiscriminately sifted together with village institutions like High Peaks Cyclery, an 8,500-square-foot temple to snazzy athletic gear, and With Pipe and Book, where locals escape the cold for used tomes and tobacco blends.
To find the rest of the Olympic venues, you’ll have to head out of town. A 15-minute drive through dramatically beautiful High Falls Gorge leads to Whiteface, New York’s largest ski area, where you can hurtle down Parkway, the super-G course dominated by Sweden’s Ingemar Stenmark in 1980. Home to the East’s largest vertical drop (3,216 feet), it’s also home to decidedly eastern skiing: brutal winds and icy conditions. (The resort’s owners recently tried to combat its stubborn nickname, Iceface, with a $2 million snowmaking investment.) Still, the serious steeps up top attract plenty of expert skiers and big events, including last year’s U.S. Ski Team Gold Cup. On the way up, keep an eye out for snowshoers doggedly scrambling the snow-clogged trails along the road; these are would-be “46ers,” racking up winter ascents of all 46 of the region’s 4,000-plus-foot peaks—Whiteface included.
For a steeper incline, head five miles south on New York 73 to the ski-jumping complex and its 90-meter and 120-meter ramps. Having rejected advice to build into a mountainside, the 1980 organizers instead bestowed these rusting high-rise souvenirs. But it’s still a kick to ride the elevator to the top, take in the view of the surrounding mountains, and peer down the long run, wondering to yourself, Why on earth would anyone…? (To watch the pros answer this question, call the Olympic Training Center at 518-523-2600 for the current week’s schedule of practice sessions.)
The remaining venues—bobsled, luge, and nordic skiing—can be found at Mount Van Hoevenberg Cross Country Center, farther out on 73. Here you can rent skis, take a lesson from the ski school, and scope out the serious racers, recognizable by their ripped Lycra. Lake Placid’s trail network is the best in North America, and Van Ho’s 31 impeccably groomed miles are the showpiece. All the 1980 trails are still used, including the infamous Russian Complaint, a grunt so steep and so long that the Soviets protested. The Porter Mountain loops, where the men competed, are twisting and tough; the women’s 5k course, meanwhile, is better suited to intermediates.
Skiing through the woods, you’ll occasionally hear PA-amplified announcements crackling through the air: “One minute, four seconds!” That would be the bobsled. Dubbed the “Champagne of Thrills” to justify its $125 price (no doubt town fathers nixed the more economically accurate “White Colombian Powder of Thrills”) the ride sandwiches you between driver and brakeman as you hit 75 miles per hour, bolting around steep S-turns pinned down by 4.5 g’s. Meanwhile, at the twisting Luge Rocket next door, you’ll go solo on a sled retrofitted with a roll bar. Lie on your back and stick your feet out in front, but don’t try to steer—Isaac Newton does the driving.
To regain your equilibrium afterward, stop by the new Lake Placid Pub & Brewery (518-523-3813), home to great live music and a particularly soothing Lake Placid IPA. Or head seven miles west on New York 86 to Casa del Sol, a noisy and fun local Mexican joint offering up great jalapeno-tequila mussels, Cadillac margaritas, and 400 kinds of courage-restoring hot sauce.

The Backcountry Retreat

After a day or two in this five-ring circus, you’ll need an antidote. Good thing Lake Placid is situated among all those 4,000-footers, known locally as the High Peaks. To the north and west lie hundreds of remote lakes; spreading to the east are the largest of the mountains, which rise precipitously from the foothills near Lake Champlain. The Adirondacks’ entire alpine area is only 85 acres—the combined square footage of all 46 summits—but when you break out of the stunted spruces onto open rock, watch out: The cones of these mountains can be coated in ice and blasted by wind and snow even when the valley floors are relatively tranquil. On clear days, thankfully, the sweeping views are commensurately bracing.
The trailheads for Lake Placid’s most popular climbs are a 20-minute drive south at the rustic Adirondak Loj (518-523-3441), where the Adirondack Mountain Club now offers dorm-style and cabin accommodations, ski rentals, lessons, and guided tours. With its perpetually roaring fire, the communal living room is also a friendly place to dry off and recount the day’s exertions.
For snowshoers, the prime day-trip is Algonquin, climbing above the Loj to 5,114 feet but entailing only an 8.3-mile round-trip. Take an ice ax for the top, and be prepared for a few rock scrambles. Cross-country enthusiasts, on the other hand, should head for the network of narrow trails that winds around the Loj and then connects with four nearby touring areas via the 31-mile Jackrabbit Trail. Or, better yet, there’s the path to Avalanche Lake: When the snow is fresh and deep, intrepid intermediates can manage this six-mile, 635-foot climb, especially if they’re not too proud to sideslip a few steep spots on the return. And what a trip it is, ending at a narrow lake flanked by towering granite cliffs.

Those who crave a real test, though, will eventually try 5,344-foot Mount Marcy, New York’s highest peak. The 16-mile route begins at the Loj and climbs more than 3,000 feet, necessitating skins on the upper section. From the summit the view spreads east for miles, all the way to iced-over Lake Champlain and the Green Mountains of Vermont. The descent offers the chance for some dancing turns—or for grabbing randomly at trees in a frantic effort to check your speed.
To experience Lake Placid’s single finest moment, though, you need no fancy equipment, not much stamina, and only a modicum of nerve. The town operates a venerable toboggan chute, a creaking, 1920s-built wooden structure that rises 30 feet from the edge of Mirror Lake. Pay $5 any evening and they’ll loan you a battered old sled and let you walk up the ramp. Climb aboard, tuck in your feet, clatter down the hard-packed run with a whoop, and then go skittering off across the ice, a thousand feet or more into the frigid dark, with the lights of town in the distance and the stars overhead. It is what I like to think of as the Hot Cocoa of Thrills, and worth the trip itself.

Lake Not-so-Placid: All the Go-Go Info for a Stay of Perpetual Motion

Getting There: Upstate New York is no place to be without a car, so if you’re in the Northeast, you’ll probably want to drive. (Lake Placid is five hours from Manhattan, five from Boston, and two-and-a-half from Albany—three during snow storms.) But if you hate long car rides, there are alternatives. US Airways flies to Saranac Lake Airport from Newark and Boston. Continental also as an express flight to Saranac Lake. Contact specific airlines for current rates. Once there, rent a midsize from Hertz (518-523-3158) for $56 per day.
Lodging: Yes, it’s possible to sleep downtown without suffering a kitschy, Olympic-themed motel. Case in point: the Interlaken Inn (doubles, $80-140; 800-428-4369), an 11-room country inn between Lakes Mirror and Placid. Right on Main Street, meanwhile, is the view-endowed Hilton Lake Placid Resort. For the most luxe lodging around, try the Lake Placid Lodge (518-523-2700). Stay in the 1940s-vintage main building, where doubles start at $300, or nestle into a lakeside cabin. Both offer great Whiteface Mountain views and cross-country skiing right out the front door.

Venue Information:
Bobsled: A new combination bobsled/luge run opened in January of 2000. The run starts at the half-mile point and runs $30 during both the summer and winter. The full track is also open to elite athletes for training purposes and is open to the general public on some occasions. The full-mile run costs $125. Open 11 a.m. to 4 p.m. Wednesday through Sunday, 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. on Monday. 518-523-4436.

Skating: The Olympic Center’s four rinks are open Monday, Wednesday, and Thursday from 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. The speed-skating oval is open 7 p.m. to 9 p.m. on weekdays, 1 p.m. to 3 p.m. on weekends. Admission is $5; rental skates, $3. 518-523-1655.
Downhill Skiing: Lift tickets at Whiteface cost $49 midweek, $54 weekends and holidays. 518-946-2223.
Nordic Skiing: Mount Van Hoevenberg (518-523-2811) is open from dawn to dusk. The $12 day pass is also good at nearby Lake Placid Resort, Cascade, and the Whiteface Club.
Ski Jumping: $8 buys a ride on the 120-meter platform’s elevator or chairlift, launching from the bottom of the jump (9 a.m. to 4 p.m., Wednesday through Sunday), but no hang time. To learn to jump, sign up for a weekend clinic with New York Ski Education Foundation ($50 for adults; 518-523-1900). Bring skis and a helmet.
For additional information and a virtual glimpse of the current conditions across Lake Placid, visit (they have five live webcams on line, updated hourly).

The post Winter? These Guys Made Winter. appeared first on ºÚÁϳԹÏÍø Online.

]]>